[–] Damndirtyape [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The only time I worry about pit bulls is when a nigger is walking it. Of course then, I'm still more worried about the niggers impulse control than the pit bull.
[–] TNDsince83 ago
I honestly think pits get a bad rap due to people training then to fight. I'm guessing if Great Danes, poodles, or Dalmatians were trained for fights they'd be named as "killer" breeds.
Separately, it's almost an inverse problem. Spooks can't be trained. As the saying goes, you can take the nigger out the jungle but you can't take the jungle out the nigger.
[–] redpilldessert 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You're right. Certain spiders for example are far more aggressive than other spiders. I think the Brazilian wandering spider counts as one.
[–] Spacehuman ago
Those statistics you've given are about pit bulls are balled faced lies. I hate when people spout this shit. I've done extensive research beyond your tabloid bullshit and the dog breed is far less likely to bite humans that many popular breeds including labs.
[–] Damndirtyape [S] ago
Are you talking about reported vs unreported bites? Also read through my other comments. I'm not breedist
[–] Spacehuman ago (edited ago)
I concede that this breed is often chosen by many people who should never own a dog and they are mistreated and abused more than other breeds and that will effect it's behavior. But I think they cause less trouble than other breeds would if put in that position.
As to inflation, any dog of questionable breed and flattish face is thrown in as 'pit-bull mix' and that gets put into the pit bull category vastly inflating the bite numbers for the breed. As to natural temperament as a breed pit bulls are more likely to be dog aggressive but far less likely to be human aggressive. This is due to their fighting past where you needed a dog that would not turn and bit it's handler when being separated during a fight. (They would kill any dog who showed inclination to bite humans). This tended to breed human aggression out of the breed. I think that to turn a pit bull into a dog that attacks people requires a great deal of abuse to the dog. Temperament testing shows over and over that pit bulls are on par with dogs like golden retriever.
The more dangerous breeds are those bred to protect inanimate property from humans. They are bred precisely to be inclined to bite humans without needing to be told to do so. I guess we should be glad that hood rats like pits because if they chose German Shepard's or some other guarding type dog it would be far more dangerous for others.
[–] blackguard19 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The difference is society has accepted the obvious differences among dog breeds and some apartment complexes like mine don't allow aggressive dogs like pit bulls. Pit bull owners bitching about how their pit bull is sweet and their pit pull is nice and would never hurt anyone remind me of liberal nigger apologists.
[–] Damndirtyape [S] ago
Pit bulls do have strong bites. Before them Rottweilers were at the top of the list, another nigger favorite. Before you get a dog, you have to know how they act. Mine gets energetic and protective, so I run him a lot and let him socialize with other dogs. If I never did those two things and kept him locked up in the house all day, I can see how he'd get neurotic and lash out at strangers.
[–] redpilldessert 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Only on here would I expect to see such a post. It's truth of course, but the rest of the world is FAR too blinkered to even consider such a parallel.
Kudos.
[–] redpilldessert 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Nah, it's just they're kept down by the Labradors, Collies and Alsatians of the world.