0
1

[–] ForWhiteSake 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

How do empty threats and fire alarms equate to a state of terror?

The same way mean words online warrant feminists standing before the UN insisting they're grounds for "harassment."

What? Both sides can't play the same game? The difference here is that I haven't seen any MRA or red pill advocate scream over feminists or disrupt their speeches, nor have I ever heard of a domestic shelter for women shut down by them.

0
0

[–] RedditCEOEllenPao ago 

What? Both sides can't play the same game?

I don't know. Should we debase ourselves with such tactics? Don't we, quite often, deride their attacks with "there are no bad tactics only bad targets?" Personally, I'd like to be better than that. If you want to go ahead and model your worldview after the same logic that gives rise to idea like "buying a woman a drink unsolicited at a bar is a form of sexual harassment." then that's on you, brother. Count me out.

0
0

[–] Fambida ago 

Um, wut? Both bomb threats and fire alarms are both calculated to cause fear, of dying by bombs in one case, and dying by fire in the other. They're also calculated to cause fear of speaking. All in all that's textbook terrorism.