0
0

[–] WingNut125 ago 

I'm convinced that she's just trying to stay relevant to be someone's VP at this point (other than Trump).

2
0

[–] Rummel 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Because she's a pawn. She was expidited from the kiddie table to the actual debate because the establishment told the MSM to do so. Her surge was totally manufactured in a weak attempt to stump Trump with sexism.

It didn't work, now Carly is just a used tampon flying around in the wind.

1
1

[–] newoldwave 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

I think she did quite well. She never says anything stupid like Hillary's "vote for me because I'd be the first woman president".

0
3

[–] cpoakes [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

She is certainly more intelligent. She may not say stupid things, but she is a liar. Of her time at HP: "...we transformed a company that was falling behind and failing to one that was growing and succeeding." Debunked here.

0
1

[–] MoveThemGoalposts 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I don't like Fiorina, but this shit is lol:

She has a complicated feminist record. As the New Republic's Rebecca Leber has pointed out, Fiorina has suggested that modern feminism is “an orthodoxy that seeks to portray all men as the enemy and women as requiring the constant assistance of government.” In light of her complicated relationship with feminism, her argument about championing women from within the Republican Party simply fell flat.

Fell flat to tumblr feminists, maybe.