7
-2

[–] BoiseNTheHood [S] 7 points -2 points (+5|-7) ago 

More proof that leftism is a deranged ideology.

6
-2

[–] hellrazor 6 points -2 points (+4|-6) ago 

What part of leftism touches on anything about child molesters, again?

2
1

[–] draaaak 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

The part that ignores the rampant child molestation taking place in Islamic societies.

0
2

[–] A_Fringe_Element 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The leftist march for equality and egalitarianism will always lead to degeneracy.

2
3

[–] ShinyVoater 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

I tell friends, colleagues, and strangers I meet (as I believe birthday parties present an excellent opportunity to enlighten people on the matter), when they fail to understand why I am sympathetic towards pedophiles, “How would you feel if you couldn’t ever have sex with anyone? What if you also couldn’t look at the porn you liked because it was illegal, and couldn’t confide in anyone for support?” By this point, most people begin nodding their heads in agreement.

Apparently birthday parties are also pedo hangouts. You only give a kid rewards until he stops wetting the bed; once you understand that these things are wrong, you get punished for doing them. Since people get "don't rape" and "don't watch child porn" drilled into them before pedophilia's even diagnosable, they don't deserve little calendars with stickers on them that get them new toys every months they don't rape a child! How damn hard is this for people to understand?

0
1

[–] ninjajunkie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Exactly. Like addicts who want everyone to hold their hand and cheer them on. Fuck them. I was an addict of various substances for 15+ years and quit. You don't deserve an award for doing what you were supposed to be doing all along. You quietly pick up the pieces, try and start over, and be glad you're not getting punished more than you punished yourself. /rant

edit:spelling

1
16

[–] morrwin 1 point 16 points (+17|-1) ago  (edited ago)

But Jacob had not touched a child. He had contacted whom he thought was a 10-year-old girl in a chat room and made plans to meet up with her.

When he arrived, he discovered he had been corresponding with an undercover police officer, and was arrested for luring a minor.

Still amazed Salon didn't accuse the cop of being racists or something. I mean who does the cop think he is to try to stop a pedophile from connecting with little girls?! /s

0
1

[–] UrCoolerOlderBrother 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

He was just a trigger happy pig on a power trip! Profiling left and right. Entrapment! Tyrants!

0
3

[–] morrwin 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Freedom is dead! I mean you can't even contact 10 yo girls in chat rooms and meet them in person! /s

0
0

[–] Fambida ago 

That really boggles muh noggin. "He hadn't touched a child! He was just caught ATTEMPTING to."

WTF salon.

7
-3

[–] jeegte12 7 points -3 points (+4|-7) ago 

I am not saying that we should condone pedophiles who act on their desires. I am saying that we should not judge people who were not given a choice in terms of whom they are attracted to.

i don't really have a problem with this.

he lured a 10 year old, and we can make assumptions, but the fact is that he didn't do anything. he certainly did not "get caught in the act."

3
7

[–] BoiseNTheHood [S] 3 points 7 points (+10|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Seriously? He tried to seduce who he thought was a 10-year-old, and went over to the house, only to be arrested by the cops. That's the definition of being caught in the act - his intent was to have sex with a child!

The fact that there are people defending this even on Voat is truly scary and sickening. I really hope this isn't where society is going, where we're all forced to "accept" degeneracy like pedophilia, bestiality, rape, and incest.

2
3

[–] qtm 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

What's wrong with incest? The only thing I know of is an increased risk of genetic diseases in offspring. But they can use contraceptions.

4
-2

[–] draaaak 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago 

Whoever voted you down is just a child molestation sympathizer. Shame.

1
-1

[–] jeegte12 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

i'm not defending anything. i'm trying to look at this from an objective POV because that's so hard to do in cases like this. just look at this comment section.

3
5

[–] draaaak 3 points 5 points (+8|-3) ago 

How much of this do you think has to do with all the Islam that's being shoved down the west's collective throats?

4
-2

[–] gramman74 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago 

Everything

4
0

[–] draaaak 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

This would be a lot easier to deal with if it wasn't linked to the Islamic invasion.

1
8

[–] Spaceballs-1 1 point 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

I would suspect that it's probable that one of Salon's editors may be a pedophile.

4
-1

[–] Kaizervonmaanen 4 points -1 points (+3|-4) ago 

Or you know, the editor likeslikes free speech and to let controversial voices have their say

2
14

[–] draaaak 2 points 14 points (+16|-2) ago 

This better not be the next sexuality civil rights movement. "I was born this way!" fuck off.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

4
-4

1
1

[–] newoldwave 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Hey, it's the 21st century and now the left is pushing for an "anything goes society". I'm guessing most SJW's are also weirdos who want to be see as "normal".

1
1

[–] sp00kygh0st 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Rampant Degeneracy

0
1

[–] the_sovereign 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Jared Fogle is the new Harvey Milk

0
1

[–] A_Fringe_Element 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well, Harvey Milk along with most of the early gay rights advocates were kid fuckers as well.

1
3

[–] Phrunkis 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Cultural Marxism knows no bounds.

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)