2
3

[–] ShinyVoater 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

I tell friends, colleagues, and strangers I meet (as I believe birthday parties present an excellent opportunity to enlighten people on the matter), when they fail to understand why I am sympathetic towards pedophiles, “How would you feel if you couldn’t ever have sex with anyone? What if you also couldn’t look at the porn you liked because it was illegal, and couldn’t confide in anyone for support?” By this point, most people begin nodding their heads in agreement.

Apparently birthday parties are also pedo hangouts. You only give a kid rewards until he stops wetting the bed; once you understand that these things are wrong, you get punished for doing them. Since people get "don't rape" and "don't watch child porn" drilled into them before pedophilia's even diagnosable, they don't deserve little calendars with stickers on them that get them new toys every months they don't rape a child! How damn hard is this for people to understand?

0
1

[–] ninjajunkie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Exactly. Like addicts who want everyone to hold their hand and cheer them on. Fuck them. I was an addict of various substances for 15+ years and quit. You don't deserve an award for doing what you were supposed to be doing all along. You quietly pick up the pieces, try and start over, and be glad you're not getting punished more than you punished yourself. /rant

edit:spelling

3
-1

[–] Zenogias 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago  (edited ago)

"How would you feel if all you wanted to do was murder somebody, but you couldn't. What would you do if the only thing that could arouse you was tasting the blood of your enemies? How would you feel then?"

Like a normal fucking human who isn't a monster. Thanks.

1
3

[–] Phrunkis 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Cultural Marxism knows no bounds.

3
-2

[–] Ecilsemoh 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Thanks, mods, for staying on top of editorialised titles in v/news submissions.

1
0

[–] Ecilsemoh 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

With all the "kill them all" bullshit, there is a point that seems to be missed here: These people exist. They are in your community and possibly your family. We cannot and will not murder people because there is something fucked up in their sexuality that makes children attractive to them. It is also impossible to segregate them all for multiple reasons.

Personally, paedophiles disgust me. I am pretty uncomfortable with mental illness as a whole, but this is a flavor that is especially bitter.

That being said, having to admit that these people exist and are not criminals until they act on their urges is beyond positive, it is absolutely necessary in order to: 1. Gain funding in order to establish programs that effectively research and treat the problem 2. Get the word out that if this is you, here is where you can get help.

This is a product of a diseased mind. We are not a people that euthanize because of disease.

It is fucking hard to humanise people who have a disposition to act in such a horrific way, but it is NECESSARY in order to establish programs and awareness. It is necessary in order to promote voluntary enrolment in treatment. The status quo produces criminals and raped children. The least distasteful option is pretty clear to me.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Ecilsemoh ago 

Difference is we as a society say that being a homosexual is ok as it involves two consenting adults. Two people who have equal control and power over their own lives, equal to the rights of heterosexual couples because of this. As marriage is "just a thing that you do" as a couple, courts found that gays have this right just the same as straight couples.

The "protected class" comes with the fact that many people don't fall into accepting the above and Govt. is going to step with laws to ensure this happens. This may be govt. overreach, but that is not the point of discussion.

This is not relevant to discussion of pedos here or in any other rational conversation.

0
2

[–] A_Fringe_Element 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

B-but the left told me the slippery slope is a fallacy!

I'm surprised only on one thing; I figured they'd be shilling for the rights of zoophiles first. I guess cat lady liberals care more about animals than children though.

0
1

[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nah, they probably just think they need to cover their human bases first. Don't want to be distracted with "Why are you concerned about that dogfucker when it's against the law to fuck my eight-year old daughter?", now would we?

0
2

[–] ninjajunkie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Of course they are. Idiots don't admit they are wrong when faced with truth or facts; they double-down on their shitty ideas instead. Just look at most politicians.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)