1
-1

[–] 1smartass 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

fails to address the issue

It addresses you perfectly, if you read it, you would have read about yourself.

to obfuscate the facts in each

All three have overwhelming scientific consensus on their side, you're opposite that. You're right there with anti vaxxers, EMF fears, and all the anti science health and diet related woo that's ever come down the pike.

Science is a method at getting at the truth, you don't use scientific methods, you're bullshit doesn't belong in a science forum. The only reason it's allowed here on Voat is because the userbase is so small and anti science, it's very unwelcoming to anyone who's pro science. They're just not going to hang here after finding out it's largely populated with the r/conspiracy crowd.

Science is a fantastic tool

Do not invoke science, you fly in the face of it, you shit on it.

0
0

[–] 2794431? [S] ago 

Here you are treating science as if it's something "holy" it is only has holy as a toilet plunger, a hammer, or any tool. "Scientism" is not science. It's a propaganda tool. Either you are knowingly playing a subversive game, or are brainwashed. Scientific "consensus" when it consists of publicly funded scientists can be trusted. When the "consensus" is fabricated by corporate funded research, then it's questionable, as were the many "scientists" who said Tobacco and Lead were safe, and it took a minority of courageous scientists to fight the corporate forces that were about profit over lives.