0
63

[–] Empire_of_the_mind 0 points 63 points (+63|-0) ago 

this has been discussed/observed in the past and most people think it's used by Twitter to filter and ignore those complaints. Now, if this were Tumblr...

0
26

[–] thephantompoop 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

I agree. I think that instead of having the SJWs calling and emailing, they provide a space for their complaints to be taken and then trashed

1
7

[–] TwilightShadow1 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

Sadly it seems that they've started to catch onto this and have just started mass spam reporting instead.

0
4

[–] ScientistSupreme 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

In the business world, thats called 'section 13-ing' the paperwork.

0
12

[–] DRSE 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Hopefully ticking that box sends the complaint straight to the garbage.

0
1

[–] RedLeader 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I bet something happens to an account that uses that as a reason for reporting another.

0
3

[–] citrion 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Even so, there's miles of difference between being offensive/disrespectful and disagreeing with an opinion. It would have made more sense if they had said something like "attempting to degrade or nullify my opinion" instead, at least it would have been in the same boat.

0
2

[–] Empire_of_the_mind 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

whatever the difference they share the common trait of being a bullshit complaint that should be ignored. that's actually the best clue that this is the purpose of that option.

0
7

[–] profanion 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Can this weapon be used against them as well?

0
12

[–] 2763837? 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

"You hurt my feel-feels with facts, that is the same thing as abuse"

0
14

[–] Pandapopo 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

"You hurt my feel-feels with facts, that is the same thing as abuse Cyberviolence"

Gotta use the approved and endorsed term by the UN here buddy

1
1

[–] Loumedia 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

They took it all back, though. Makes Anita look real bad.

1
8

[–] The_Only_Zac 1 point 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

No one said anything about it being gounds for a ban... People were probably reporting people for disagreeing with them anyways, and they added that to sift out the ones they can ignore.

0
5

[–] dso_asx 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I hope that option sends it straight to the bit bucket

0
0

[–] destinthegreat ago 

It does

1
1

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

To be frank, this triggers me.

0
3

[–] sostoney 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You can be Frank if you want. Don't let anyone tell you differently. We all understand how hard this is and will support you in this difficult transition.

0
0

[–] derbyvoice71 ago 

Look, God gave this person a name when they were born. It's 1Sorry_SOB and if you think just CHANGING A NAME can be done that easily, and everyone HAS to accept it, then you can just walk out that door. When Jesus was riding around on his T-rex in Eden he never said people could change their Internet names on Voat. It's just unnatural.

0
4

[–] TheDude2 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

When is vitter coming? The twitter where anyone can post anything anonymously.

1
0

[–] Kronicals 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

He raped me with that comment.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)