0
2

[–] hypercat 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

MATH: She would have had to consume over 30k calories over the recommended amount each year, since the day she was born to get this fat (assuming she would normally be around 125 lbs).

0
2

[–] clockworkgirl21 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'd have guessed 40.

0
1

[–] tigerwarning 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

At what point do you say, this is enough. When you look at your self in the mirror each day you think "Yeah, this will do." What kind of sickness is this shit.

0
1

[–] fat_handle 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's waddling death.

0
1

[–] DontLikeSaladDodgers 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

She looks like a fat man with a stuffed brassiere...

0
1

[–] DontLikeSaladDodgers 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

She looks like a fat man with a stuffed brassiere...

0
1

[–] goatboy 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

We need a new way to describe fat age. A dog year is about 7 normal human years or the amount of life it has expended relative to human life expectancy.

We need fat years or the amount of life these things exhaust relative to normal human years.

What do y'all think? Is 1 human year equal to about 3 fat years? If that's the case, then this creature is really 69, is probably drawing Social Security of some kind, and only has a few years left.

0
1

[–] BigBonesDontJiggle 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Shower thought: We need a concept like dog years for fats. Fat Years. Since they seem to age twice as fast and die twice as one I feel like 1 year = 2 fat years. So really she's 46 in fat years. Which visually seems about right and as far as lifespan goes she's probably at about the halfway mark so it seems relatively accurate there too.

load more comments ▼ (45 remaining)