0
10

[–] FUPA_Berzerker 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

If it's her cakes/... with her name on it then there is no way she could get in trouble no? Hams are not yet recognized as mentally disabled people who can't be held responsible for eating whatever food they see in front of them!

0
9

[–] Elcycs 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Just to make sure, include a "Do not eat!" warning on them. I'd love to hear hammie try to justify that. "I stole the clearly labeled 'do not eat' food and ate it! Waaa!"

0
0

[–] amnat ago 

Theft doesn't absolve you of poisoning charges. Yes, you can get in legal trouble for poisoning foods that you knew or had reason to believe that the ham would steal. This is because, while you may think it's believable that you just really enjoy foods tainted with laxatives or pepper extract or whatever, your intention to cause bodily harm is readily apparent, given the circumstances.

0
7

[–] FatJavalina 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

That's actually a good point. OP could argue having some digestive issues, and it's easier to take them with food. Not only that, but laxes tend to be easier on the stomach with food because then there's actually something to flush out (though that may be a more disordered way of looking at it since people don't (I don't think) generally take them unless they're blocked up to begin with).

Simple solution, my shitfriend! I fully support this idea then. If fatty ends up in the hospital, it's its own damn fault.

0
3

[–] skinny4life 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Also, do you really want some hambeast shitting for hours on when you have the misfortunate of occupying the same apartment as it?

0
5

[–] FatJavalina 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Dear god...how did I not even consider that? *vomits

Edit: word