[–] novictim 0 points 28 points 28 points (+28|-0) ago (edited ago)
And that is exactly why PC Principal is featured on South Park. The pendulum has swung back to much into the red of political correctness.
Dawkins and Maher and Sam Harris and Salman Rushdie and all the other reasoned and reasonable people want us to question more, not less. Questioning this kids motives in light of his MSNBC statements on being seen as a "bomb maker" before this incident can't and shouldn't be ignored.
[–] RoninSnowman 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
Then you, my friend, are exactly part of the problem, being any PC is like saying it's ok to have a little infection, but eventually it grows and spreads into what we are seeing now. PC is a refusal to confront and question rationally and use ones sense and brains when confronted with issues, it's a way to silence opposition and disagreeing points of view when they don't fit the PC's own, I hope you do see that it is a fallacy to have any PC. Being good to everyone is ok, being PC is like giving out Aid's, and unless you're Jared, you don't want to be known for that.
[–] blkadder 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago (edited ago)
"...In an answer to a Twitter user who wrote: “I think you too frequently confuse ‘truth’ with ‘obsessive and unnecessary dedication to accuracy’..." Where to even begin with all that is wrong with that assertion? And Dawkins apologized to them?! SMH....
[–] poop_on_a_stick 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
I think Dawkins just knows how to pick his battles. Even if he stood by his statement unapologetically and tried to explain his perspective to a bunch of SJW twitterers, how long would it take? My guess is something between too long and infinity. It's not right of course but these people are like piranhas and social media is their pond.
[–] blkadder 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
The odd thing is I have seen him be unapologetic and hold the line at other points which is one of the things I respect about the man. Rule #1 of dealing with SJWs in my experience is to never, ever apologize to them as you potentially would to a reasonable person. They take it as a sign of weakness and will just amp up the attacks until you are apologizing constantly. There is no appeasing the vast majority of them so it is pointless to even try.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 41 points 41 points (+41|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] pjhile 1 point 12 points 13 points (+13|-1) ago
but right to be prudent
Prudent would be to look at it, realize there is no explosive, and send him on his way. He's a freaking child. Not immediately notifying his parents should be illegal if it's not already. If you can't tell the difference between some wires and a bomb, you shouldn't be in charge of anything remotely close to law enforcement.
He was more provocateur than electronic genius.
Electronic genius? He's a child.
[–] Big_Time_Sensuality 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
These kids are building working underwater robots. Doing something like this basically requires being an electronic genius. Some of them are even freshmen. Here's an actual suitcase bomb. Tell me they don't look similar. Hell, the bomb looks cleaner than his "clock". Highly doubt I'll be meeting Ahmed at any of the competitions I do.
[–] didntsayeeeee 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Still, what would you do if you found it on a train? You'd think "that movie prop bomb is probably a prank but I should call the police anyway just in case". And the police would say "that's probably a prank but we should get the bomb squad anyway". And everybody would have their time wasted.
The kid needs to understand that fake bomb threats get taken seriously, so calling the police should have taught him that lesson.
But instead it taught him the lesson "cry victim in a way that the media narrative likes and you'll get loads of free stuff"
[–] didntsayeeeee 2 points 12 points 14 points (+14|-2) ago
Depends what he was doing with it.
We haven't heard the full story, only his side, and his side is obvious bullshit.
[–] GrislyAtoms 2 points 18 points 20 points (+20|-2) ago
At first I was all pro-Ahmed, but I've heard/read some good points that have swayed me a little the other way. I'm on the fence about the whole thing. I don't know who's full of shit, and who isn't anymore. It's getting harder and harder to tell.
I'm still pro Ahmed. I don't believe it's too so with race though. More like a teacher was over reacting (as was the police)
[–] cattarhero 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It's always about race. It's not about your race, it's about your "religion", dip-wad!
[–] throwaway56789 ago
Agreed. I will continue bringing up the fact that the Tsarnaevs were, literally, Caucasian. They were white kids from the Caucasus mountains of Russia. Not Arabs. Ethnic Chechens are not Arabs. They're Muslim Russians. They could have passed for Jewish or Greek. The reason they are reviled is because their actions stemmed from their belief in their murderous cult. Members of Aum Shinrikyo weren't terrorists because they were Asian. They were terrorists because of the actions they took that stemmed from their belief in their murderous cult. Jim Jones' members were of all races; he founded Jonestown in Africa and called his cult the "rainbow family" -- that is, a community of all cultural backgrounds, but all of whom were centered on following the orders of their cult leader. Just because Muhammad is dead and has been for 1,500 years, and because he allegedly "heard the voice of God" and his literate co-conspirators inscribed his teachings in a book that was allegedly "inspired" by divine revelation, doesn't make Islam anything other than a cult of violence and murder. It's not a valid belief system deserving of respect just because it's old and has a lot of members.
Muslims can be of any race. John Walker Lindh was an American from California. Cat Stevens was an Englishman. It's not race. It's cult belief. We need to stop giving Islam protections as a "religion" (I would venture it's time to stop giving any religion carte blanche in the constitution) and start calling it what it is: a cult. You get arrested for preaching death to psychiatrists, you're not going to be let go because you follow Scientology. You're going to be locked up because what you do is pertinent to a dangerous cult, and you don't deserve to be given the benefit of the doubt.
It's time we find a final solution to the Muslim problem.
[–] Roqu 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I thought he died of cancer?
[–] shittersfull 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I think that's hitchens?
[–] throwaway56789 ago
I'm Ron Burgundy?