[–] drakesdoom 1 point 10 points 11 points (+11|-1) ago
Or they know their audience. I don't want to see men of any other race or black women in porn.
[–] toobaditworks 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Let me click on it to see if you're right.
[–] Tythetyrant 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Yeah fuck people and their personal sexual preferences. We should make porn an equal bang-able industry in the name of PC and equality!! /s
[–] 1Sorry_SOB 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago (edited ago)
And remember Jews were FORCED to create the porn industry because YT wouldn't let them make money doing anything else!
There is nothing they like more than see a shiksa defiled.
[–] youareivan 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
while on some levels i agree with dean the fact that he says that with out ir it's hard to "get any sort of interesting scenes" implies that there is something especially interesting about interracial sex which kind of undermines his position.
[–] big_fat_dangus 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
That's a good point. James Deen complaining about a lack of "interesting" scenes is like a crackhead complaining about a lack of bleach in his rocks.
[–] goat_boat 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
"Success in the porn industry tends to require a certain level of respect for fantasy, even when it ventures into the politically incorrect."
Best quote in the whole piece. The whole article angle crying about black performers being underpaid is ridiculous though. The market will bear what the market will bear.
[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If something brings in less money, then it's only common sense to cut the cost if you can to restore the profit level; either reduce the wage level(as mentioned in the case of black actresses) or cut the availability(as in the case of black actors) and you bring things in line with what the market wants. And, as it turns out, what most of the market wants are people who look like them. Sure, you can claim otherwise, but how often do porn films come out even without so much as an oblique reference to the race of the nonwhite actor/actress in their description?
[–] big_fat_dangus 2 points 13 points 15 points (+15|-2) ago (edited ago)
A more accurate title would be "a certain race has a big STD problem".
I love that the article dances around the issue and pretends not to know why actresses make the choices they do. As if filthy ass porn whores have some sort of moral compass that prevents them from working with black actors. It's the STDS. An std will throw a major, sometimes permanent, wrench in a porn performers' career.
[–] HoneyNutStallmans 4 points -3 points 1 point (+1|-4) ago
That's why blacks are banned from donating blood. Oh, what's that, it's only MSM that can't donate blood?
[–] the_spectre 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
You realize that there's a pretty big difference there, right? Blood donation organizations test the blood.
While the big companies in the porn industry test their actors and actresses, but not all companies do. And if an actor/actress working for a big company is found to have an STD like herpes that can't be cured, they're done. In fact, they're often done even if they have a curable STD because it's assumed that it demonstrates poor sexual hygiene -- a big no-no in an industry that sells sex and needs to have a pool of non-diseased actors/actresses.
[–] ILikeMyDogNotYours 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
its one thing to contract HPV1-2 from a blood transfusion. Its quite another to get HIV.