[–] puddlewonderful 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I read somewhere that 90% of the trial participants experienced no changes in sex drive. Sounds likes the developers are just trying to ride a media wave and make $$$
[–] LOLThatsJustRetarded 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
Oh look, feminist BS from the CBC. There's a shocker.
[–] Uptonogood 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Maybe the problem is that they're just not attracted to their partner in the first place.
Perhaps instead she should have chosen someone who she actually wants to spend time with. Or just stayed alone.
[–] psychoch0mp 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
My uncle was on viagra because he couldn't maintain an erection. Like magic after he divorced and got with someone else problem went away. So yes I see what ReedOwl means as viagra doesn't increase sexual desire but it did allow him to have sex with his wife. Sexual desire is an issue that effects men and women. Did these critics comment that male Viagra distracts from the causes of low male libido?
[–] shinybedpan 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I think this headline could be applied to most big name pharma products on the market.
[insert drug name] detracts from the real causes of [insert condition, real or made up].
You shouldn't have to take a drug that gives you anal seepage so that your legs stop bouncing. (The last part is not based on fact only a overblown version of the crap I hear on pharma commercials) I feel like I might be going off topic.