[–] smokratez [S] 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 5.3 years ago
I analysed the first part. That is all I did. I didn't analyse the whole book while leaving parts out. I only talked about the first part.
[–] 2029918? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 5.3 years ago
My point is that there are overlapping themes in the parts, and that you are attempting to analyze themes and purposes on incomplete data. That is all I'm saying. Sorry to have angered you.
Then go make a post talking about the whole book. I am only talking about the first part. You didn't anger me. You are making yourself look dumb.
[–] 2029918? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
My point is that there are overlapping themes in the parts, and that you are attempting to analyze themes and purposes on incomplete data. That is all I'm saying. Sorry to have angered you.
[–] smokratez [S] ago
Then go make a post talking about the whole book. I am only talking about the first part. You didn't anger me. You are making yourself look dumb.