1
10

[–] Kleyno 1 point 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

Well, to be fair, we are fucking terrible. ;)

0
5

[–] ThisWeirdIndividual 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

and sexy ;)

0
5

[–] Warden 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

u the most of all ;)

3
21

[–] Arotaes_Forgehammer 3 points 21 points (+24|-3) ago 

Good. We don't want them if they say things like that.

7
12

[–] Marijuana_Merlin 7 points 12 points (+19|-7) ago 

I stopped when they called content "organic", how the blessed hell's is something posted to the internet in any sense of the word "organic"?

I hate when retards use words incorrectly.

1
11

[–] SpaceRosa 1 point 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Usually when people say that, what they mean is that it happens without being forced. People post what they want and that's how you get variety, instead of multiple people making a distinct, organised effort.

3
2

[–] Marijuana_Merlin 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago 

I can sort of understand that. But I think another word would be more appropriate.

Saying "Organic" the way they used it just makes you sound like you are just trying to sound intelligent.

1
0

[–] regularfellar 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

"roving bands of purist downvoters" I don't even know what this is supposed to mean.

0
4

[–] FPHrefugee 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Well see, when content is a little baby content, they don't put round up on it or any other pesticides, then it grows into a beautiful organic content :)

[–] [deleted] 0 points 73 points (+73|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

10
-2

[–] ArchangelleShe 10 points -2 points (+8|-10) ago 

This is just the beginning. Now that I control AskVoat, you don't know what's coming. =)

11
76

[–] CamelBeard 11 points 76 points (+87|-11) ago 

Well I agree with some of the points made. Lately voat is only about SJW and she etc. I don't care about any of them, I just want a place to share cool stuff without censorship!

2
42

[–] ThisWeirdIndividual 2 points 42 points (+44|-2) ago 

Search for cool subs then. /v/all is not Voat.

2
29

[–] Norm 2 points 29 points (+31|-2) ago 

plus you can easily block subs that you don't like anyways, so it's easy to avoid anything you don't want to see.

6
22

[–] Biplane 6 points 22 points (+28|-6) ago  (edited ago)

/v/all is voat. First impressions are important. We can say it's not about /v/all but fact is people come see the hate speech (that doesnt allow for debate) and think "wow what a closed minded group" and leave. I'd say the majority of us are doing our own thing respectfully, but allowing for subs that don't support freespeech by default to have a spot on /v/ all is some oddly unvoat thing we seem to love. Too many people just don't understand that it's not banning ideas, it's stopping those from being able to supress free of speech.

0
0

[–] CamelBeard ago 

I spend 2 hours hitting the random button, lots of cool subs, BUT most of them had no posts for 3 months

2
1

[–] Scandinavian 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

So do we. We can fight them now or we can fight them later. The longer we wait, the less chance free speech wins.

0
2

[–] keldoen 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I do agree that people talk about SJW stuff too much, I have noticed a lack of content on otherwise interesting subs. The best thing we can do about this is just post more in a wide variety of subs.

0
3

[–] Frogolocalypse 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I agree with him. Hate-filled bigots just found a place that had a wider distribution than normal. It's kind of a 50/50 chance of them being replaced and pushed out by normal people, or this place descends into an echo chamber of morons. I haven't really been looking at this place for weeks because of it. The jury is still out on whether it is getting worse or better.

[–] [deleted] 4 points 47 points (+51|-4) ago 

[Deleted]

2
18

[–] Staross 2 points 18 points (+20|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Even voat users agree, the front page is quite toxic. I would be surprised if it doesn't affect voat growth:

https://voat.co/v/askgoat/comments/441642

0
13

[–] AustNerevar 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

The fucking invitation only system is what's affecting Voat's growth.

0
25

[–] didntsayeeeee 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

So, uhh, /v/fatpeoplehate agreed to be taken off the front page for a while in order to assist the growth of the rest of the site. Would /v/niggers be interested in doing the same?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

2
21

[–] AustNerevar 2 points 21 points (+23|-2) ago 

Yeah, I for one don't want people to associate Voat with racism. They can have their subverse and I would fight against a ban on them if it ever happened, but it always disappoints me when I see racism or bigotry on Voat. We were never about that and that isn't what this place is for. It just gives opponents ammo to paint us a den of bigotry. I don't appreciate being considered such.

0
0

[–] wackwack ago 

As a frequent /v/niggers poster as well, I would support such a measure.

1
4

[–] surrealsirloin 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Most of the people here are here because their other online communities were shut down by the leftist brigades on reddit or elsewhere. Naturally a lot of the content here is going to be angry ranting and fighting back against that machine.

However, I'm interested in seeing what kind of community we can build in the long term. It feels great to escape the leftist hugbox, and I think a lot of potential users will find that enticing, especially as the tide starts to turn against the cultural Marxist agenda.

0
2

[–] Gorillion 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

LOL, Snapzu. I keep forgetting that's a thing.

0
0

[–] ccoxe0 ago 

What's Snapzu? I've never heard of it.

load more comments ▼ (22 remaining)