Why do articles never have a picture of what there talking about?
ie: Huge shark may be a magalodon. There were eight videos capturing four distanct viewing points but there's not a god damn Hi res photo of it only shakie videos.
If an article says Hummingbird tongues are awesome, I want to see a damn Hummingbird tongue. I want to see that its awesome if not directly seeing the science behind why its awesome.
[–] InceptionBox 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Why do articles never have a picture of what there talking about?
ie: Huge shark may be a magalodon. There were eight videos capturing four distanct viewing points but there's not a god damn Hi res photo of it only shakie videos.
If an article says Hummingbird tongues are awesome, I want to see a damn Hummingbird tongue. I want to see that its awesome if not directly seeing the science behind why its awesome.
Rant Over
[–] hybridxer0 [S] ago
I really wish you would speak your mind and tell us how you really feel...