[–] SilentByAssociation ago 

To a degree I would agree. In fact I would posit that anger is necessary (in limited amounts or pending the appropriate situation).

When I say he's "given to anger," I'm talking dropping the "banhammer" on someone who makes a naïve or innocuous comment. He'll over-analyze it and suddenly snap. Not very fond of that.

[–] badruns ago 

Yeah, that kind of behavior is common in "creators" that didn't really use the internet prior to 2010. These people are used to the walled gardens on YouTube or twitch etc that gave them ban rights without consequences for banning people constantly.