[–] 26760244? ago 

also, if you post to voat, make it a text (discuss) and include a link in the post to the original article or even put a couple links in so we can find it on http://searchvoat.co

[–] 26753664? ago 

It is better than whatdoesitmean.com

[–] 26753894? [S] ago 

Obviously. That site is disinfo spam.

The aggregators are still a problem.

[–] 26753013? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Here's an aggregator I like to use: https://normalamerican.com/news/

It's updated every few minutes so it's current as can be.

[–] 26753139? [S] ago 

I am not against link aggregators. They are great!

Bookmark them. Visit their site daily.

But let's not turn 50% of links in QRV into aggregator links. When the aggregators go down we lose lots of the links here.

[–] 26752881? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

OP is a Twitter AD representative.

[–] 26752680? 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

You have that problem on any site on the internet.

I prefer to have the wearetthene.ws link since it gives the link to the original post on 8kun and the post can include important commentary.

What you should encourage people to do instead is to copy & paste the content on wearethene.ws to Voat so if the source sites go down, we have the content here.

[–] 26753066? [S] ago 

Yes! When these aggregators go down we have no working links here.

[–] 26752861? 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

ignore OP, he is a shill who has for a very long time attempted to pull QRV folks away from wearetthene.ws.

Your response is true of many here - we like to see the commentary from 8kun without having to sift through the porn, strange format, gore and muh-joo shilling on 8kun.

Clearly the shill's masters don't want ours or new eyes on this information and analysis, for good reason.