[–] jtreddit 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 19 days ago (edited 19 days ago)
It is already in court, the result is contested.
[–] jtreddit 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 19 days ago
The safe harbor deadline may not apply.
[–] Lonegunman65 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 19 days ago
Why wouldn’t it? The precedent was set during the 2000 election.
[–] TSE 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 19 days ago
Why set the date 1 day AFTER the safe harbor deadline and not 1 day BEFORE the safe harbor deadline? Nobody wants the get involved with this, even the SC is scared of the DS. Only the Trump team is fighting for America.
[–] qessence 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 19 days ago
Concerns and/or evidence of fraud may render deadlines irrelevent.
[–] Lurker17 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 19 days ago
Legal Group Argues Electoral College Deadlines Aren’t Constitutional and When Fraud Is Involved — May Prevent Free and Fair Elections
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/legal-group-argues-electoral-college-deadlines-arent-constitutional-fraud-involved-may-prevent-free-fair-elections/
[–] qessence 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 19 days ago
Zactly!
[–] jtreddit 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
It is already in court, the result is contested.
[–] jtreddit ago
The safe harbor deadline may not apply.
[–] Lonegunman65 ago
Why wouldn’t it? The precedent was set during the 2000 election.