[–] [deleted] 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago (edited ago)
Serious question. If Barr’s treasonous underlings tell him there is not evidence of election fraud, then Barr will repeat this, right? I mean, if MI has everyone under surveillance and Barr is a white hat, then Barr will let the traitors hang themselves.
Of course, Barr’s history tells me he is DS or made a deal.
[–] G45Colt_II 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I think he said he hasn't seen evidence of voter fraud. Doesn't mean there isn't any, just that it hasn't been sent his way.
There's no sense in sending over anything too quickly. We want a solid case with so much evidence that any sleepers in the way will be flattened by it.
[–] bwarren2010 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Makes sense...but why is he running mouth that there was no voter fraud?
[–] hildberht 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Thinking about it more, given the level of corruption in the DOJ maybe it is simply a case of they do not want any information re what they have falling into the wrong hands so Barr is correct, they have nothing because that's to deny the deep state any knowledge. Hope so but it gets harder with every day.
[–] con77 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
waiting,,,,,,,,