[–] ardvarcus ago 

Also legally if they destroy evidence it's assume they're guilty.

We don't need to presume they are guilty, we bloody well know they are guilty -- but is anything ever going to be done to them to punish them for their guilt?

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

[–] cantaloupe6 ago  (edited ago)

spoliation of evidence

The spoliation inference is a ...negative evidentiary inference... that a finder of fact can draw from a party's destruction of a document or thing that is relevant to an ongoing or reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding: the finder of fact can review all evidence uncovered in as strong a light as possible against the spoliator and in favor of the opposing party.

spoliation can be taken as (contributing) evidence of guilt.

Also tampering with evidence can have a heavy penalty.

If the law is actually applied remains to be seen