[–] QuickFYI 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
While I agree with that, I was thinking about it..
What about the trade off?
Which deaths were changed?
For example, since most people in big cities all around the world are pretty much on lock down most of the year, some major death counts like car accidents, should be way lower..
But since the total is the same, what took its place?
Suicide? Other medical issues that would be easily found on routine checkup that never occurred because of the China hoaxdemic?
I would imagine there is going to be some trade off and people will analyze this data for years.
[–] flopsymopsy ago
They introduce lockdowns after the fact, then say they were effective, and that's the reason for reduced fatalities. They lie, people believe, nothing happens.
[–] Polic3Stat3 ago
The overrun hospitals bit is getting OLD! Interviews with distraught medical personnel on the verge of mentally breaking-down is getting OLD! Lies all around.
[–] KakistocracyClerk 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The gates vaccine should fix the low death rates.
[–] RM-Goetbbels ago
If this were a real pandemic I would personally know of ten people who have died OR AT MINIMUM 100 who have contracted the virus.
I know of 2 "confirmed" cases in my personal and professional life and I deal with hundreds of people per month.
[–] NoseSubversion ago
Anybody remember the zika virus under king nog? No?? Not surprising. It only had the capability to deform children genetically and potentially end the human species. But that didn’t have a 98% survival rate so no mask needed.