[–] PanteraFan99 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I've had this argument with numerous people and just get back the blank sheep stare, or the "are you a doctor how dare you question medical professionals" response.
[–] Silver_Sky 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Very different virus from Corona viruses which have airborne and surface transmission instead of sexual/body fluid transmission of herpes.
[–] englishwebster 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
how about this - its possible to carry a disease but not have symptoms. by this logic anyone vaccinated is intentionally made ill
[–] Carpools 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Correct. We always have several things our immunity system is holding at bay. If we do stupid shit like stay inside, wear a mask, dip ourselves in Purel every 10 minutes, and eat carbs/sugar nonstop, one of the many enemies at the gate will get in, and weaken or kill us.
[–] AntiMarx 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Here's one loose idea, don't take this as truth though, any real scientists chime in please:
The manifestation of symptoms seems to arise from the disruption of specific biological systems being involved in the viral life cycle, for example, the role of cell receptors and enzymes, like in SARS it is the disruption of ACE2 as the virus binds to enter the cell which causes biological feedback systems which then present as symptoms I.e. change in temperature.
Symptoms have to be present in a thriving host, because the virus cannot replicate without disrupting these feedback systems. otherwise the likely explanation of having virus but no symptoms is that the virus is being rejected and terminated by the body: it is present but its life cycle is not. This should indicate that the virus life cycle is not happening and the likelihood of the production of enough viral cells to expel the body and contaminate others is unlikely. And so 'healthy carrier' is an evil term for a healthy person with a working immune system.
If this 'theory' is complete shite please dispel it, if it has validity, please expand it.
[–] Swiiirlyhunter 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
The PCR test they are using is shit. A virus probably doesn't even exist. The CDC doesn't even have a sample to test against. It's a sham from top to bottom.
[–] StBlops2cel_is_Lord 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The inventor of the PCR tests says it's shit for muh Cohen 19 testing
[–] AntiMarx 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
PCR isn't a test it just amplifies a designated compound, the test is then performed on the results of PCR process. The sample tested against is based on a sequence around 20 units long: SARS-COV2 genome contains around 30,000.
Because the sample is so small A) it is not representing the theoretical virus in full B) the small sequence range is [shared and present in] by other types of coronavirus and possibly other cells etc too.
Again, I am not putting these forward as scientific truth, but in this world we need to speculate and solve it ourselves it seems, so I'm willing to speak and be wrong in search of a better model. Any science ppl please chime in.
[–] uab ago
Wizardry