[–] PhilKDick 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

Both have in common: the game is rigged against you.

[–] Cat-hax 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

At least its publicly known or assumed with slots

[–] PoBoy 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

There's a reason slot machines are also known as reverse atms

[–] LOOKAROUNDYOU 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

If the kikes protected election integrity the same way they protected their jew-gold we would be in better shape.

[–] SyncStatus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This would have been the perfect title.

[–] 26562317? [S] ago 

It would be the perfect title for half the posts on Voat for the past two weeks.

[–] PagingDrBenway 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Making the comparison makes the whole situation a lot more fucked-up in perspective. The fact that petty amounts of cash are treated with such high security compared to the machines which decide the fate of nations clearly sows what a rigged game politics is.

[–] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Nevada gaming laws are setup to protect and promote their industry. It's made to look like consumer protection, but in the end it favors big casinos over consumers and over smaller ones. That's what you get with regulatory capture.

If there were some money to be made in ensuring voter confidence, they'd have better systems.

[–] Thadeus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not necessarily when one is on every single day and the other is used 2 maybe 3 days a year.

[–] PagingDrBenway 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The stakes are far higher to be fair.

[–] ibepokey 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

i've worked for a slot machine company. can confirm. the machines, and EVERYTHING about them is highly regulated, and verified to ensure the house always wins. in the casinos i worked in, the house controlled (to what degree they could) the odds on all slots. not on a machine-by machine basis, but on an average of the machines as a whole

[–] Splooge 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

If it’s IGT and roughly 5 years ago, then we’ve probably talked on the phone at some point.

[–] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Yeah I remember last time the software in voting machines was controversial.

/Old

[–] Apathy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I remember back when these machines were made by Diebold, who also made ATM's. Apparently you couldn't leave a voting machine unattended/supervised without it being hacked in 2 minutes. Meanwhile ATM's go for weeks or months without anyone even looking at it, and they're never hacked.

[–] Phantom42 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

What the fuck is that whore on the left wearing? As if she wasn't already a fucking disgusting subhuman.

[–] CouldBeTrump 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Show some respect for your mother.

[–] Fuckinginsanegoat2 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So, if these security items were tweaked for voting, a much more secure system could be created.

load more comments ▼ (10 remaining)