[–] Carpools 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No way of knowing unless there are fractions of votes, and they totally misrepresent society.

[–] nobslob 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The casinos and our elections share one thing in common: They both let you know that the odds are in their favor, good luck!

[–] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Yeah I remember last time the software in voting machines was controversial.

/Old

[–] NEWCON 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Kimberly Guilfoyle?

[–] LOOKAROUNDYOU 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

If the kikes protected election integrity the same way they protected their jew-gold we would be in better shape.

[–] SyncStatus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This would have been the perfect title.

[–] 26562317? [S] ago 

It would be the perfect title for half the posts on Voat for the past two weeks.

[–] JTMTL 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I suspect these machines were used more for profit more than turning elections. Especially in the US where much of the battle line is drawn down the middle. They killed the Golden Goose by over exposing the profitable cheat machines. IMHO.

[–] Apathy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I remember back when these machines were made by Diebold, who also made ATM's. Apparently you couldn't leave a voting machine unattended/supervised without it being hacked in 2 minutes. Meanwhile ATM's go for weeks or months without anyone even looking at it, and they're never hacked.

[–] PagingDrBenway 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Making the comparison makes the whole situation a lot more fucked-up in perspective. The fact that petty amounts of cash are treated with such high security compared to the machines which decide the fate of nations clearly sows what a rigged game politics is.

[–] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Nevada gaming laws are setup to protect and promote their industry. It's made to look like consumer protection, but in the end it favors big casinos over consumers and over smaller ones. That's what you get with regulatory capture.

If there were some money to be made in ensuring voter confidence, they'd have better systems.

[–] Thadeus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not necessarily when one is on every single day and the other is used 2 maybe 3 days a year.

[–] PagingDrBenway 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The stakes are far higher to be fair.

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)