[–] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Yeah I remember last time the software in voting machines was controversial.
/Old
[–] LOOKAROUNDYOU 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
If the kikes protected election integrity the same way they protected their jew-gold we would be in better shape.
[–] SyncStatus 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This would have been the perfect title.
[–] Apathy 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I remember back when these machines were made by Diebold, who also made ATM's. Apparently you couldn't leave a voting machine unattended/supervised without it being hacked in 2 minutes. Meanwhile ATM's go for weeks or months without anyone even looking at it, and they're never hacked.
[–] PagingDrBenway 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Making the comparison makes the whole situation a lot more fucked-up in perspective. The fact that petty amounts of cash are treated with such high security compared to the machines which decide the fate of nations clearly sows what a rigged game politics is.
[–] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Nevada gaming laws are setup to protect and promote their industry. It's made to look like consumer protection, but in the end it favors big casinos over consumers and over smaller ones. That's what you get with regulatory capture.
If there were some money to be made in ensuring voter confidence, they'd have better systems.
[–] Carpools 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
No way of knowing unless there are fractions of votes, and they totally misrepresent society.