[–] 26555475? ago 

Happy Thanksgiving

[–] 26555456? ago 

Depends on the languagne used right? I believe compiled Java files can be decompiled

[–] 26555499? [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

No. It depends on the compiler and the target hardware. You can write code in any languange and have a compiler that takes that code and does fuck all with it so long as the target hardware is capable of using it.

[–] 26555666? ago 

but I've seen decompiled java code myself. Is it not possible to fetch the code from the Dominion machines?

[–] 26555437? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

thanks for the info.

[–] 26556013? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Don't thank him for the information.
All compilers do is convert higher level languages into Assembly, and Assembly can be read by humans, or coded in.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_language
Roller Coaster Tycoon was coded entirely in Assembly, by a grade SSS+ Autist.
http://www.alearned.com/roller-coaster-tycoon-programmed-one-guy-assembly/
The code can be analyzed, as is, without the need of a decompiler.
A decompiler just makes the analysis faster for junior-mid level programmers.
And yes. I am claiming that you are not a high level programmer, unless you can read and write in Assembly.

[–] 26557659? ago 

Compiled code gets converted into machine language, essentially just a bunch of numbers. The following instruction x86 instruction:

MOV eax, 1

Raw can look like this:

00 15 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 01

These numbers are just random, unless you assign meaning. 00 15 could be the x86 opcode for 'MOV' and then the CPU knows that MOV takes 2 operands, a destination and src and reads a certain number of bits ahead for each operand. This is how compiled code works, it reads a number, this gets converted to a CPU operation, and then each CPU operation has a number of operands that the computer has to read.

This is why you have to compile for each target machine x86 vs ARM vs SPARC or 32 vs 64 bit. And to reverse engineer any compiled program, you need a decompiler because it gives you context to the bits.

[–] 26557498? ago 

True. But tedious as hell.

[–] 26556585? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The code can be analyzed, as is, without the need of a decompiler

while technically true, in practice it is not. it sounds from your post that you're a fanboy of coding, but not an actual assembly coder beyond perhaps a "hello world". even just following JMPs around is such a huge pain in the ass that we have made tools to make our lives easier which includes disassemblers. and if the code is intentionally obfuscated it becomes arbitrarily difficult to read without toolkits. would you really want to follow a thousand references in a row by hand?

or are you going to tell me that all the best crackers in the world are junior-mid level programmers because they use tools instead of wading through printouts of raw assembly?

btw nobody codes in assembly unless they're autistic or have to (which is a tiny number of cases). from a practical standpoint, C is a tool for writing and reading assembly faster and with fewer mistakes. and, given the state of compilers these days, the assembly that C generates is faster than hand-written assembly outside of a handful of toy examples.

A decompiler just makes the analysis faster for junior-mid level programmers. And yes. I am claiming that you are not a high level programmer, unless you can read and write in Assembly.

that's like saying you're not a good construction worker unless you can move a large pile of dirt with a spoon instead of a shovel. and that bulldozers are for noobs.

[–] 26556236? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Hey man, I know nothing about code or how any of this shit works. Was just thanking the dude for posting information that was interesting. Didn't even know what the hell a "compiler" was. Actually I still don't really know, but hey, at least it's got me interested.

[–] 26555421? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Yes, determining that the machines were programmed for a specific outcome will take time though.

We don't have that much time. Like Rudy said, it could take 6 mo to a year or more to prove this in court.

The afidavids of eye witnesses and their testimony in court and data showing massive spikes of vote dumps in a few minutes, is I think enough to declare that election invalid.

[–] 26559332? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not if you used FISA and caught all the players playing....

[–] 26556849? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Once fraud is proven, POTUS wins. The beneficiary of the fraud should face repercussions, especially given that so many of those connected have obvious connections to the DNC/Biden candidacy.

Proving and showing how everything happens is how we get safe, secure elections moving forward.

[–] 26555919? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Precisely, and what the globalists are counting on is that these timescales are not what make population-level representative choices. They know that if Biden slides in while we wait for this proof, then by the time proof arrives, it will be old news. That's all it takes. Truth is not truth at the level of large groups. It gains a different character taken across hundreds of millions of people - truth is subordinated to the group mind, where stability predominates. People simply don't like to rethink things that they take to be old news. Think about it, the further back in time you have to reach to "edit" reality, the less stable your entire reality becomes - hence, the reason why old news is concrete news.

The democrats understand this psychology. It's also why they couldn't let headlines like the "Russia hoax" and things die in the news cycle. If they let that pause for too long, it would have become old news. For every thinking person, it did, but now we also have to account for desire. Desire plays a big part of interpreting our reality as well.

[–] 26555461? [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think you're right. This is all so outrageous.

[–] 26555412? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A dumbocrat coder would come up with

if (voteForBiden) bidenVoteCount = bidenVoteCount + 10;

if (voteForTrump) trumpVoteCount = trumpVoteCount + 1;

[–] 26555357? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Would you be able to have code that does the fraud and then deletes the offensive bits?

There are so many points of failure - the whole system stinks from top to bottom. Just tabulating in foreign nations presents a thousand holes to exploit.

In a well designed system there should be a FULL audit trail from the ballot to the final count, that anyone can go back and verify each step.

Why do banks never get their numbers wrong?

[–] 26558399? ago 

Banks do get their numbers wrong. But they keep their mouths shut and eat the errors if necessary. Database recovery program developers know this is true.

[–] 26555427? [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

To do that, you would have to have a CPU that could overwrite it's own code and I don't think that is possible. You could do that with a coprocessor and if the exact location of the code on the CPU was known, which would be easy, then you could have it so that at a certain time, that code was overwritten with a harmless and unsuspecting comment, but, then the code on the coprocessor would be there, showing what storage loations were overwritten, or it could delete its own firmware but then you'd have this blank coprocessor sitting there connected to the main CPU like "what's this for?". We would have to forensically analyze the hardware and the software, which is possible.

[–] 26556930? ago 

What the fuck are you jabbering about? Of course code can delete itself.

[–] 26555620? ago 

You underestimate the unlimited skills of the Venezuelan and Serbian programmers LOL

[–] 26555544? ago 

It wouldn’t take that. Just some code to clean up after itself... I’ve written a few exploits in my day

[–] 26555491? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Don't worry the nations most trusted organization is on it, the FBI.

[–] 26555316? 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

Ghidra..... NSA software that uses the logo that looks just like 8kun? CodeMonkey recently resigned from 8kun. If only we had the tools. Hello fellow IT faggot...

[–] 26558157? ago 

Now we know why Ron resigned from 8kun. He is listed as a witness in at least one of the lawsuits.

[–] 26559308? ago 

Did he really resign? Short of him saying he did, how would you know?

[–] 26557734? ago  (edited ago)

Q wasn't posting some software tool kit for shits and grins. He was making a statement to them, but they ignored it and tried the cheat anyway. They had nothing to lose, and Q already knew they would try anyway since Q knew they had nothing to lose.

It's not if the white hats have the code. They have it, and they have worked it backwards and forwards. They know all the back doors, and holes were it is being manipulated.

[–] 26557254? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I tried out Ghidra, it works good. Highly recommended.

[–] 26556876? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Codemonkey is a fucking noob, its embarrassing as hell that people here talk him up.

8kun was down for like a.month when hotwheels started going after them because ron didnt know what the fuck he was doing. It didn't go back up till they got outside help.

[–] 26557277? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Hi Hotwheels. Still hanging out with your cambodian hookers?

3 replies

[–] 26555268? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Would the machine confiscated in Germany possibly be the machine needed to prove this?

[–] 26555294? [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It all depends on where the offending code resides.

[–] 26555521? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

On AWS servers that went down yesterday...

[–] 26555343? ago 

The Military must have thought or known it was in Germany if they raided a building for one machine. Personally, I would put my money on that machine.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)