[–]26557322?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
I'm not a computer guy by any means, but my understanding so far is they could have potentially written a code that when the machine is powered off and then powered on again the code that causes the fraud would be deleted. Something about flash.
I don't claim to know what I'm talking about, but I've been reading up on this some
[–]26557370?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
That's why they've made it a serious felony to have a copy of the ballot box software. I'm sure even casual reverse engineering would surface serious vulnerabilities and fraud.
[–]26557836?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
My assumption is that we already have seized their Github account and thus have direct access to the code base. Perhaps if they were hosting on prem, it was one of the servers that was seized in Germany?
[–]26558031?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
maybe I would not have the function directly in my code.
I would have it created/written by randomly placed lines into volatile memory so that when power is cut the function disappears and when power is restored the function is then again written to memory.
[–]26558170?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
There will be some sort of backup of the actual votes. That will allow for a full audit. In any location where such a backup does not exist, those votes will be omitted from the count.
[–] 26557322? ago
I'm not a computer guy by any means, but my understanding so far is they could have potentially written a code that when the machine is powered off and then powered on again the code that causes the fraud would be deleted. Something about flash.
I don't claim to know what I'm talking about, but I've been reading up on this some