[–] 26556703? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You're correct. But you also omit the blatant fact that their own software manual outlines how to set the variables for weighted votes

If (vote(name)=biden)

{

Vote(count) = vote(count) + ( 1 * weightA)

}

else

{

vote(count) = vote(count) + ( 1 * weightB)

}

[–] 26556732? ago 

Also, since these machines apparently run on Win10 it's entirely possible that the software was built on .NET which should be easily decompiled into something readable from .NET's IL.

[–] 26561987? ago  (edited ago)

.net framework 3.5, j# , c++ and jre runtimes are all required installs for the software to work.

There are a load of different software components so they may be written in different languages.

[–] 26556496? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Forgetting that code could have been modified the night before the election and then directly after back to original. Machines were connected to the internet and connections worldwide were noted.

[–] 26556916? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The actual voting machines are air gapped and not networked to the internet. The companies that run them have servers and connections but those are different.

[–] 26557708? ago 

It is easy to stuff a secondary wifi connector in there. Hence the demand for a declaratory judgement on seizure of equipment.

[–] 26557610? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Except when they aren’t. Video and network prof of connected machines on voting day are going around.

They *should * be air gaoped from date of certification to months after election, but that would be logical and legal and reasonable and stuff.

[–] 26556507? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yes true.

[–] 26556554? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Also, documents scanned multiple times, usb files of fraudulent votes, illegal votes of dead, harvested votes, votes transferred by drag and drop from folder to folder, votes that were blank and modified by the machine, votes bought in bulk from China are all not covered by this. I think the forensics must be done, but also that not finding something can be pronounced as truth no fraud took place and the opposite is true.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

[–] 26555684? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

LOL

[–] 26557257? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Change Request: Please update Str = "Biden is now the presidnt elect. All praise creepy pedo Jose Biden and Heels up Harris the hoe!"

[–] 26559043? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Change request approved. Update v1.2 available. You will need to update in order to use network features.

[–] 26555412? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A dumbocrat coder would come up with

if (voteForBiden) bidenVoteCount = bidenVoteCount + 10;

if (voteForTrump) trumpVoteCount = trumpVoteCount + 1;

[–] 26560584? ago 

You can also write code that Eats It's Self.. at certain objective meet the code will rewrite it's self and "erase" it's trail.

Just saying.

[–] 26560437? ago  (edited ago)

The issue here is that floating point arithmetic is not perfectly reversible. The exponent and mantissa are both variable and there are numbers without perfectly round representations which lead to an increase in Epsilon as the number of operations increases. Yeah, we can create a "probable" reversal but with the number of adjustments I've seen it's likely raised Epsilon really high.

The question is how much tolerance for error does an election need? If we cannot accept a single vote error then Epsilon is a serious factor. If not, we'd have to make the estimation so that Epsilon was minimized.

[–] 26560338? ago 

you forgot the encompassing outer logic..."for 1 to 600K do{}" (loops 600K times) or "while (1) {}" (forever loop). remember they were stupid, so UNATURAL is your watchword if you want to reproduce this.

[–] 26560273? ago 

If the Chinese have the code due to an escrow requirement (I believe I read that the other day), then I would guess we have it via the NSA.

load more comments ▼ (25 remaining)