[–] FreeinTX ago 

No allegations of fraud in that lawsuit.

Why are you being disingenuous?

[–] Gringojones ago 

You are celebrating a win of 69 ballots.

[–] boekanier ago 

When you won't see it, you don't see it

[–] DontBeRacist ago 

So some "Cohn" Jewish judge made this decision.

Hitler happened for no reason at all.

[–] BringtheRainOnIsrael 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

While conceding that state law and the aforementioned state Supreme Court decision means that the “directive [to securely seal the ballot secrecy envelope] is mandatory such that an elector’s noncompliance results in a ballot that is not valid,” the court decided against a “strict interpretation” of the law for the current election because of the uncertainty that accompanied Pennsylvania’s first real foray into universal mail-in voting.