[–]26519851?[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Changing the definition of a word (or making one up) then applying it to an argument is mental gymnastics. Let's see what would happen if I did this. After we changed the definition of person. Me: We can make certain ppl slaves because they aren't persons. We have science on our side because the word person excludes ppl with green eyes. Of course that is absurd , but that is your basis that you are using as an argument. This is nothing short of Orwellian and for ppl like yourself not to understand this makes you insane.
[–] 26519851? [S] ago
Changing the definition of a word (or making one up) then applying it to an argument is mental gymnastics. Let's see what would happen if I did this. After we changed the definition of person. Me: We can make certain ppl slaves because they aren't persons. We have science on our side because the word person excludes ppl with green eyes. Of course that is absurd , but that is your basis that you are using as an argument. This is nothing short of Orwellian and for ppl like yourself not to understand this makes you insane.
[–] 26520102? ago
The dictionary is Orwellian? Do you believe the dictionary is oppressing you?