It's not conclusive proof of anything - hell, they could have written this about Tucker as a way to discredit him if he ever tried to speak against their interests. But it's certainly possible he's been compromised for a while, delivering hot takes a day or two after /pol, voat, and td.w figured them out just to gain our trust in order to turn on us later. Not sure I know what to believe at this point.
Assume for a minute people are running a pizza shop as a front for child trafficking, it's probably not a good idea to suggest that the people eating pizza there are child molesters. Sometimes a pizza is just a pizza.
[–] anoncastillo 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
It's not conclusive proof of anything - hell, they could have written this about Tucker as a way to discredit him if he ever tried to speak against their interests. But it's certainly possible he's been compromised for a while, delivering hot takes a day or two after /pol, voat, and td.w figured them out just to gain our trust in order to turn on us later. Not sure I know what to believe at this point.
[–] GlobalSouth 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The hot takes on pol and voat aren't consumed by many people, so they are still hot when Tucker serves them.