[–] 26455813? ago 

Stand by your point (or implication, whichever). You must have had something in particular in mind, surely?

[–] 26455897? [S] ago 

It's almost like you're a (((journalist))), trying to fish out "another failed prediction from Qanon conspiracy theorists" to put in the hit piece for whatever propaganda rag you write for. Almost.

[–] 26455922? ago  (edited ago)

Kek. Should've known you're not even a legit QAnon. Just a nazitard trying to blend in with stupid inferences about JFK (and/or JFK Jr.), which incidentally leads back to my original point about "shills" injecting ludicrous bullshiit about JFK/JFK Jr. for the purpose of later discrediting QAnons.

Complete with your projection in trying to paint me as the one looking for a "gotcha" moment to hang QAnons with, when it is quite clearly you looking to do that.