[–] corrbrick 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Big fucking deal. PCR tests are notoriously unreliable. Tomorrow he'll probably test negative. As Kyle Mullins, the Nobel Prize winning inventor said, PCR is a DNA manufacturing technique and is not suited for diagnostic testing. The same thing the test maker's literature say.

[–] Lurker17 [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Q using false positive to protect Grassley from the coming storm? Hard to say what is real in the fog of war.

[–] corrbrick ago 

Sorry, Lurker. I wasn't criticizing your post. I was criticizing the robot-like reaction to the phrase, "tested positive." As if it really means something. It could, but according to even the NY Slimes, in 96% of the cases, it doesn't.

[–] AngelofDeath 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Meaning he had a cold and got tested and it came back with a false positive?

[–] Lurker17 [S] ago  (edited ago)

Hard to say. Could be a ruse to get Grassley out of harms way for when the shit goes down. Or, he's actually sick. Or something in between.

[–] eldorann 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

All war relies on deception.