Big fucking deal. PCR tests are notoriously unreliable. Tomorrow he'll probably test negative. As Kyle Mullins, the Nobel Prize winning inventor said, PCR is a DNA manufacturing technique and is not suited for diagnostic testing. The same thing the test maker's literature say.
[–]corrbrick0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Sorry, Lurker. I wasn't criticizing your post. I was criticizing the robot-like reaction to the phrase, "tested positive." As if it really means something. It could, but according to even the NY Slimes, in 96% of the cases, it doesn't.
[–] corrbrick 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Big fucking deal. PCR tests are notoriously unreliable. Tomorrow he'll probably test negative. As Kyle Mullins, the Nobel Prize winning inventor said, PCR is a DNA manufacturing technique and is not suited for diagnostic testing. The same thing the test maker's literature say.
[–] Lurker17 [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Q using false positive to protect Grassley from the coming storm? Hard to say what is real in the fog of war.
[–] corrbrick ago
Sorry, Lurker. I wasn't criticizing your post. I was criticizing the robot-like reaction to the phrase, "tested positive." As if it really means something. It could, but according to even the NY Slimes, in 96% of the cases, it doesn't.