[–] toggafreggin 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago
One of em got a 9 IQ?
[–] ScottMAGA 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
That's three standard deviations between the mean for the "university", which is something that should happen 1-in-2000. Doesn't seem impossible to me. IQ is just a normal distribution, which means that it can go into the negatives. However, I doubt that existing IQ tests are calibrated to work properly at that level, so all of these results are suspect. The overall conclusion, that these are really stupid people, holds true of course.
[–] krypt 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I agree, either a nigger administered the IQ test and accidentally took away papers one hour early by nigger brain mistake, or that 58 was a correlation to their male Phds, as a percentile, not a IQ assessment.
You might be right because Nigerians IQ is well studied, and closer to 72 and even College IQ average of Black nigerians should be closer to 72. Niger (Niger not Nigeria) is indeed IQ 69. Refer : https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country
College IQ of paid and motivated South African university students accurately measured near IQ 84 I seem to remember.
https://files.catbox.moe/09tb5j.mp4
Professor Philippe Rushton visited South Africa in search of High IQ African students in Africa's top universities . The results are shocking .
AustralianRealist - Prof. Philippe Rushton - "Latest Research on Race"
https://archive.org/details/youtube-t1mgrTGeDPM [archived momentarily!]
https://files.catbox.moe/5feenq.mp4
[–] SilentByAssociation [S] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
'Waist-to-Hip Ratio and IQ; Any Association in a Sample of Nigerian Female Population?'
https://t. co/oSspVEGWKZ
Edit: banned domain. Try this:
https://www.journalajarr.com/index.php/AJARR/article/view/30333/56914
Their conclusion is that there's poor correlation. Everyone has that mental image of an obese, unintelligible and unintelligent black woman with a rear that looks like two pigs in a rucksack. They're a walking case for r\K theory.
[–] krypt 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Waist to hip EXTREMELY HIGHLY correlated even tossing asians and focusing only on female caucasians in the INFAMOUS Tuft's University IQ studies of the 1980s.
The larger the breasts, the LOWER the IQ. Bigger tits were rare in STEM, and at MIT and Cal-tech every Phd Physicist female, even white, were nearly flat chested. The reason is genetic. The Brain hemispheres stop SPECIALIZING function after puberty hormones. Too many hormones or early puberty results in a "jock brain" not a "nerd brain" . The fatty sheathed cells stop differentiating to one brain hemisphere after puberty, and reduces bell curve outliers.
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Why did they measure waist to hip ratio? Were they trying to identify the best candidates for breeding? Maybe they were going to try to use eugenics to improve their ugly and retarded population.
[–] daskapitalist 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
Most likely seeing if there was a strong, inverse correlation between butt size and IQ. It's not functionally different from investigating the stereotype that extraordinarily attractive females often aren't very intelligent. It's harder to measure in other ethnicities because of more abstract beauty standards, but for Nigerian culture waist/hip ratio is a beauty standard and is trivial to measure.
It looks like a weak correlation in this study (so ixnay on the theory), but as social science studies go it's relatively good because at least it's quantifiable and presumably reproducible. Which is better than the usual rhorsach of subjective slop the social sciences calls "studies".
[–] Olivefigs 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Actually, extraordinarily good looking or even just normally beautiful people are known to be more intelligent and of sound mental health. Beauty indicates physical health and lack of genetic mutation, the brain is the biggest organ to be affected by mutations. These mutations are easy to detect through facial or bodily deformities. If you look at the far left, you will see they are very ugly which perfectly corresponds with their mental illness. Check out dr. Dutton for details
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Most likely seeing if there was a strong, inverse correlation between butt size and IQ.
If this was honestly the purpose of the study that seems like the most typically african study ever.
[–] krypt 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Because female breast size (caused by secondary sexual characteristics of hormone and advent of puberty onset date) is actually highly correlated to IQ for college students, proven in many reviled and demonized yet factual science studies in the 1980s.
BIG TITS? = Lower IQ on average.
[–] Olivefigs 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yes, and big tits also = promiscuity or lower fidelity, especially if developed earlier. Usually, big tits indicate an R strategy individual, and small boobies can indicate K strategy. So, if you want a faithful wife, fellas, get yourself an itty bitty titty committee member
[–] UlyssesMcGill 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Maybe they were trying to prove that the ones with the fattest asses were the dumbest
[–] skimster 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Sheboons are the worst. If you never had to interact with one of these things, consider yourself lucky. I had multiple run ins with these beasts in Oakland and Queens and I understand why the ones with dicks don’t stick around.
What gets me is why anyone would stick their dick in one of these monsters. But then again, I’m not a nigger.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] DANKINGDORAT 0 points 20 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago
To think 85 was retarded before it got dropped to 70 to prevent a mass chimpout...
[–] krypt 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago (edited ago)
That is True! Below IQ 85 was retarded for many decades, then it affected 50% of all US niggers , so they changed it... excpet for niggers on Death Row in some states. Then IQ 85 Dindu Nuffin, because feeble mind does not know its bad to rape and kill Whiteys.
Unpopular fact:
USA Blacks are retarded, and Genes prove why they are retarded in negro DNA on US soil!
Half of USA Blacks are RETARDED!
This fact is from official American Association on Mental Retardation, http://www.aamr.org
For US Negroes, who are from race-mixing for over 200 years far far smarter than African Negros, the US Blacks are very retarded ON AVERAGE still.
Niggers forced the US medical definition of "Retarded" to be altered because OVER HALF of negros are born with retarded IQs.
In 1959, AAMD set the IQ threshold for mental retardation at < 85. The (((civil rights movement))) of the next decade forced psychologists to rethink this boundary, because half the African American population fell below it!
In 1973, responding to this concern, AAMD (by then AAMR) changed the threshold for retardation from IQ < 85 to IQ < 70. The boundary moved south by one standard deviation! The proportion of blacks below the threshold instantly dropped from about 50 percent to 12 percent. Subsequent refinements made it still more difficult to meet the criteria for retardation.
When Binet in 1905 produced the first IQ test, it promised to revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of mental retardation. A half century later it came under attack for reasons Binet could not have imagined. Could any of the pioneer psychometricians have foreseen Larry P. v. Riles (1979), a California class-action suit that focused on IQ testing of young black children? The court held that IQ tests were not valid for African Americans. It banned California from using the tests for placing black students in classes for the "educable mentally retarded" or equivalent categories on the grounds that the tests were biased. After a series of appeals, the district court ruled that no special education related purposes exist for which IQ tests could be administered to black pupils. Though only a California ruling, the case began a political assault on standardized testing that has spread beyond the IQ test to college entrance exams, promotional exams and more.
http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/retard.htm
La Griffe du Lion Volume 2 Number 9 : September 2000
Court Bans Use of I.Q. Tests for Blacks for Any Purpose in California State:
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ368279
THE POLITICS OF MENTAL RETARDATION: A TAIL OF THE BELL CURVE:
https://archive.fo/1mNdz
Niggers are retarded because pure blacks have %0.00 percent neanderthal high-IQ genes. Every other human on earth has large amounts of Neanderthal genes, even asians, who got them from fucking Denisovans a few times in history.
Not one Neanderthal DNA gene has ever been found in any 300 year old or older skeleton in Africa, ever! %0.00 percent neanderthal high-IQ genes!
DNA is well proven to be source of 80% of IQ based on huge research studies.
The two bombshell 80% DNA source of IQ studies ! :
2018 : 1,016 genes
paper = Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis In 269,867 Individuals Identifies New Genetic And Functional Links To Intelligence
Nature Genetics (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0152-6
Now 1,016 genes are proven correlated to IQ (many are brain , skull, or birth canal related, some might be merely (non-negroid) genes in general.
2018 : 538 genes
UK Biobank DNA yields 538 genes that are linked to intellectual abilities - genetic effects on intelligence and personality
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20180313/Large-number-of-genes-associated-with-intelligence-discovered.aspx
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-017-0005-1
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-017-0005-1
pop science description of the above :
538 genes that are thought to be linked to intelligence (by comparing 300,000 test subjects) :
http://archive.is/pJYfe (original deleted and censored, archive still exists)
TL/DR: Half of USA Blacks are RETARDED (< IQ 85) as per classic definition by aamr.org (AAMR)
[–] dummythicc 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
And correct me if I'm wrong but it was posted here earlier that the US Military after extensive research determined that a person <83 couldn't be trained to do anything of use whatsoever. Total writeoff. Now fucking imagine how dumb 58 is and ask yourself why in holy fucking hell we are importing ANY of these "people".
[–] Skeptic5000 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Kek
Edit: (((Civil rights movement))) (Source: "Culture of Critique" and "Jewish revolutionary spirit")
[–] Plavonica 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Nice to see someone else put it together.
[–] KebabAndNoseRemoval 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
US Army still won't hire someone with IQ less than 83
[–] QuickMafs 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That's not actually true, the military will actually accept 2-4% "category four" recruits useless as they are. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/750844001
[–] StopTheEvilAgenda 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
What happens if you go through boot camp and are legitimately just retarded?