[–] FLVPJVCKS 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

About 75–80 percent of mental retardation is familial (runs in families), and 20–25 percent is due to organic problems, such as chromosomal abnormalities or brain damage. Mild to severe mental retardation is a symptom of several hundred single-gene disorders and many chromosomal abnormalities, including small deletions. Based on twin studies, moderate to severe mental retardation does not appear to be familial, but mild mental retardation does. That is, the relatives of the moderate to severely mentally retarded have normal ranges of IQs, whereas the families of the mildly mentally retarded have IQs skewing lower.

IQ score ranges (from DSM-IV):

Mild mental retardation: IQ 50–55 to 70; children require mild support; formally called "Educable Mentally Retarded".

Moderate retardation: IQ 35–40 to 50–55; children require moderate supervision and assistance; formally called "Trainable Mentally Retarded".

Severe mental retardation: IQ 20–25 to 35–40; can be taught basic life skills and simple tasks with supervision.

Profound mental retardation: IQ below 20–25; usually caused by a neurological condition; require constant care.

The rate of mental retardation is higher among males than females, and higher among blacks than whites, according to a 1991 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study.

By race, the overall rate was 16.6 per 1000 for blacks and 6.8 per 1000 for whites. Rates of mental retardation for black males, the group with the highest rates, were 1.7 times higher than black females, 2.4 times higher than white males, and 3.1 times higher than white females.

Individuals with IQs below 70 have been essentially exempted from the death penalty in the U.S. since 2002.

[–] Helena73 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for bringin the data.

[–] skimster 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Sheboons are the worst. If you never had to interact with one of these things, consider yourself lucky. I had multiple run ins with these beasts in Oakland and Queens and I understand why the ones with dicks don’t stick around.

What gets me is why anyone would stick their dick in one of these monsters. But then again, I’m not a nigger.

[–] Helena73 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

SAY WHAT?! NO YOU DINT!! NO YOU DINT!! OH HELL NO! IM BOUT TO GO OFF!

[–] krypt ago 

I actually, for real, read that in my mind in La'Quishas sheboon voice.

[–] pcdude 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

half of them are even less intelligent than that

[–] negrojohnny 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Damn, she a genius. Regular heart surgeon with a machete.

[–] Lechuck60 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

It appears to be given as a percentile not a raw score (see "IQ (%)"), so unfortunately I think OP is the retard here.

[–] Helena73 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I hate to say it but he might be in the 58th percentile.

You are right. It makes more sense. They are 58th percentile for nigerians probably.

[–] Plavonica ago 

They are 58th percentile for nigerians probably.

Which isn't saying much. I'm always leery of percentiles, too easy to hide it in comparison to whatever the statistician is trying to hide.

[–] krypt 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I agree, either a nigger administered the IQ test and accidentally took away papers one hour early by nigger brain mistake, or that 58 was a correlation to their male Phds, as a percentile, not a IQ assessment.

You might be right because Nigerians IQ is well studied, and closer to 72 and even College IQ average of Black nigerians should be closer to 72. Niger (Niger not Nigeria) is indeed IQ 69. Refer : https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country

College IQ of paid and motivated South African university students accurately measured near IQ 84 I seem to remember.

https://files.catbox.moe/09tb5j.mp4

Professor Philippe Rushton visited South Africa in search of High IQ African students in Africa's top universities . The results are shocking .

AustralianRealist - Prof. Philippe Rushton - "Latest Research on Race"
https://archive.org/details/youtube-t1mgrTGeDPM [archived momentarily!]
https://files.catbox.moe/5feenq.mp4

@Helena73 @Plavonica

[–] observation1 ago 

IQ between 0 and 25 are idiots.

IQs between 26 and 50 are imbeciles.

IQ between 51 and 70 are morons.

[–] PatList 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Why is the measurement for IQ here %?

[–] alacrity167 ago  (edited ago)

my best 2 guesses are that IQ is a division. mental ability divided by mental age, so a percentage would make sense. or we could be misinterpreting the result, because 58 seems really fucking low

[–] Deflo56 ago 

If they were looking at IQ’s as a percentage of the population where they placed. A large SD would make sense. Another words most of these students were in the upper 40% with a wide variance. I don’t see where it even divulged the actual base IQ. Debatably about 70?

[–] Hispeedtim2876 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I like turtles

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)