[–] FLVPJVCKS 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
About 75–80 percent of mental retardation is familial (runs in families), and 20–25 percent is due to organic problems, such as chromosomal abnormalities or brain damage. Mild to severe mental retardation is a symptom of several hundred single-gene disorders and many chromosomal abnormalities, including small deletions. Based on twin studies, moderate to severe mental retardation does not appear to be familial, but mild mental retardation does. That is, the relatives of the moderate to severely mentally retarded have normal ranges of IQs, whereas the families of the mildly mentally retarded have IQs skewing lower.
IQ score ranges (from DSM-IV):
Mild mental retardation: IQ 50–55 to 70; children require mild support; formally called "Educable Mentally Retarded".
Moderate retardation: IQ 35–40 to 50–55; children require moderate supervision and assistance; formally called "Trainable Mentally Retarded".
Severe mental retardation: IQ 20–25 to 35–40; can be taught basic life skills and simple tasks with supervision.
Profound mental retardation: IQ below 20–25; usually caused by a neurological condition; require constant care.
The rate of mental retardation is higher among males than females, and higher among blacks than whites, according to a 1991 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study.
By race, the overall rate was 16.6 per 1000 for blacks and 6.8 per 1000 for whites. Rates of mental retardation for black males, the group with the highest rates, were 1.7 times higher than black females, 2.4 times higher than white males, and 3.1 times higher than white females.
Individuals with IQs below 70 have been essentially exempted from the death penalty in the U.S. since 2002.
[–] skimster 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Sheboons are the worst. If you never had to interact with one of these things, consider yourself lucky. I had multiple run ins with these beasts in Oakland and Queens and I understand why the ones with dicks don’t stick around.
What gets me is why anyone would stick their dick in one of these monsters. But then again, I’m not a nigger.
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Why did they measure waist to hip ratio? Were they trying to identify the best candidates for breeding? Maybe they were going to try to use eugenics to improve their ugly and retarded population.
[–] UlyssesMcGill 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Maybe they were trying to prove that the ones with the fattest asses were the dumbest
[–] krypt 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Because female breast size (caused by secondary sexual characteristics of hormone and advent of puberty onset date) is actually highly correlated to IQ for college students, proven in many reviled and demonized yet factual science studies in the 1980s.
BIG TITS? = Lower IQ on average.
[–] Olivefigs 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yes, and big tits also = promiscuity or lower fidelity, especially if developed earlier. Usually, big tits indicate an R strategy individual, and small boobies can indicate K strategy. So, if you want a faithful wife, fellas, get yourself an itty bitty titty committee member
[–] daskapitalist 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
Most likely seeing if there was a strong, inverse correlation between butt size and IQ. It's not functionally different from investigating the stereotype that extraordinarily attractive females often aren't very intelligent. It's harder to measure in other ethnicities because of more abstract beauty standards, but for Nigerian culture waist/hip ratio is a beauty standard and is trivial to measure.
It looks like a weak correlation in this study (so ixnay on the theory), but as social science studies go it's relatively good because at least it's quantifiable and presumably reproducible. Which is better than the usual rhorsach of subjective slop the social sciences calls "studies".
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Most likely seeing if there was a strong, inverse correlation between butt size and IQ.
If this was honestly the purpose of the study that seems like the most typically african study ever.
[–] Olivefigs 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Actually, extraordinarily good looking or even just normally beautiful people are known to be more intelligent and of sound mental health. Beauty indicates physical health and lack of genetic mutation, the brain is the biggest organ to be affected by mutations. These mutations are easy to detect through facial or bodily deformities. If you look at the far left, you will see they are very ugly which perfectly corresponds with their mental illness. Check out dr. Dutton for details
[–] SilentByAssociation [S] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
'Waist-to-Hip Ratio and IQ; Any Association in a Sample of Nigerian Female Population?'
https://t. co/oSspVEGWKZ
Edit: banned domain. Try this:
https://www.journalajarr.com/index.php/AJARR/article/view/30333/56914
Their conclusion is that there's poor correlation. Everyone has that mental image of an obese, unintelligible and unintelligent black woman with a rear that looks like two pigs in a rucksack. They're a walking case for r\K theory.
[–] krypt 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Waist to hip EXTREMELY HIGHLY correlated even tossing asians and focusing only on female caucasians in the INFAMOUS Tuft's University IQ studies of the 1980s.
The larger the breasts, the LOWER the IQ. Bigger tits were rare in STEM, and at MIT and Cal-tech every Phd Physicist female, even white, were nearly flat chested. The reason is genetic. The Brain hemispheres stop SPECIALIZING function after puberty hormones. Too many hormones or early puberty results in a "jock brain" not a "nerd brain" . The fatty sheathed cells stop differentiating to one brain hemisphere after puberty, and reduces bell curve outliers.
[–] krypt 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I agree, either a nigger administered the IQ test and accidentally took away papers one hour early by nigger brain mistake, or that 58 was a correlation to their male Phds, as a percentile, not a IQ assessment.
You might be right because Nigerians IQ is well studied, and closer to 72 and even College IQ average of Black nigerians should be closer to 72. Niger (Niger not Nigeria) is indeed IQ 69. Refer : https://iq-research.info/en/average-iq-by-country
College IQ of paid and motivated South African university students accurately measured near IQ 84 I seem to remember.
https://files.catbox.moe/09tb5j.mp4
Professor Philippe Rushton visited South Africa in search of High IQ African students in Africa's top universities . The results are shocking .
AustralianRealist - Prof. Philippe Rushton - "Latest Research on Race"
https://archive.org/details/youtube-t1mgrTGeDPM [archived momentarily!]
https://files.catbox.moe/5feenq.mp4
[–] toggafreggin 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago
One of em got a 9 IQ?
[–] ScottMAGA 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
That's three standard deviations between the mean for the "university", which is something that should happen 1-in-2000. Doesn't seem impossible to me. IQ is just a normal distribution, which means that it can go into the negatives. However, I doubt that existing IQ tests are calibrated to work properly at that level, so all of these results are suspect. The overall conclusion, that these are really stupid people, holds true of course.
[–] negrojohnny 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Damn, she a genius. Regular heart surgeon with a machete.