[–] ScotAnon76 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

His threads were good but his videos are long, drawn-out, slow, and boring a/f.

[–] suomy_the_nona 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This video is about a very interesting theory. I think it's worth the time.

You can speed it up. I watched it at 1.5x speed, even 2x is possible. On Youtube you can use the settings symbol to select the speed factor or the shift-"," and "shift-"." keys.

[–] Fateswebb ago 

well he literally starts off by dismissing machine hacking, saying how "its covered", which was a huge turn off for me, so I stopped watching....

[–] venicreator ago 

I was just about to reply the same thing. He pauses a lot so I too listen at 2x. Always interesting. He’s a better writer than speaker but I can’t wait to hear what he’s going to say next.

[–] Jonny_Ninja [S] ago 

Well complain to him then.

[–] ScotAnon76 ago 

Nah, I don't shoot the messenger. I listen to the message.

[–] Kzintrooper2016 ago 

He got canceled on twitter.

[–] Hoppinmad ago 

This. Know your gifts. Use them well.

[–] Kzintrooper2016 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

He is challenging to listen to, but he is getting a little better with each video.

So ok, what he is saying in this video is that Team Bidem's plan was to cheat just enough to get over the line and win by a whisker, all carefully calibrated.

But Trump agents infiltrated the ballot delivery process and delivered/substituted not carefully prepared plausible ballots, but flawed obviously screwy ballots all marked for Biden that will not pass any inspection.

The people counting would have been told by Biden agents "count everything" so that is what they did.

(Numbers below are just examples to show scale.)

Instead of a camouflaged win by 500 votes in a few counties, we have a "win" of 800,000 obviously fraudulent votes.

How is Team Biden going to dispute this? "We only asked for an extra 500 votes but we got 500,000" - we are honest cheaters....

Downstream at SCOTUS instead of presenting a loss by 500 plausible ballots, its 500,000 obviously fraudulent ballots.

Basically, Trump cheated the cheaters.

Points to consider:

  • there were those screwy results where Biden won but down ticket Republicans won. Why is that?

  • Election night there was a lot of military flights - who loves Trump is loyal and can keep secrets? Special Forces?

  • Remember the pause on election night in counting votes in 2016? Similar?

  • all the coordinated messages by the media before the election?

  • Q told us Biden was being hidden away and cheating was in play.

[–] corrbrick ago 

Love it! Lessons learned in 2016 and 2018, and applied with a vengeance in 2020. This handily explains just why the ballot fixers simply didn't fill in the straight Dem bubble.

[–] Blacksmith21 ago 

Awesome. Thanks!

[–] KurtAlbert 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

too long

[–] corrbrick 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

At 18:50 Wictor mentions some outcomes of this scheme in passing: destroying the opposition party, destroying the media, destroying punditry. These are things Q tells us Q+ wants to accomplish.

[–] cabalstone 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Hypothetically, of course. LQL! Thanks for posting.

[–] Fateswebb ago 

what does he mean, "there is no reason to talk about hacking into voting machines, because that is covered?"

whats covered?

[–] Jonny_Ninja [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You'd have to ask him to be sure.

But I think he's implying that end is covered via CISA.

That doesn't mean they weren't allowed to do it, either. I think he is asserting that if they were in fact allowed to do it, it's because CISA allowed for them to just to catch them in the act.

He believes that all or most of the steal came in the form of physical ballots. Maybe he's wrong.

[–] Fateswebb ago 

well sure, I mean... hopefully, the problem is the only legal person I have seen discussing the computer glitches is sydney powell, rudy doesn't even bring it up.. I would feel a lot more confident if rudy mentioned it..

[–] Art_Vandalay ago 

Can someone chime in on why this guy's opinion is often posted and appears well regarded? Is he connected in any sort of way, have great experience/credentials, or are people just entertained by his theories?

[–] Jonny_Ninja [S] ago  (edited ago)

He's generally regarded as a logical person and he does seem to do A LOT of research.

If credentials are what matter to you, then go listen to Dan Bongino I guess.

[–] Blacksmith21 ago 

Summary for the time challenged?

[–] Kzintrooper2016 ago 

See my reply above.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)