[–] Fateswebb ago 

what does he mean, "there is no reason to talk about hacking into voting machines, because that is covered?"

whats covered?

[–] Jonny_Ninja [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You'd have to ask him to be sure.

But I think he's implying that end is covered via CISA.

That doesn't mean they weren't allowed to do it, either. I think he is asserting that if they were in fact allowed to do it, it's because CISA allowed for them to just to catch them in the act.

He believes that all or most of the steal came in the form of physical ballots. Maybe he's wrong.

[–] Fateswebb ago 

well sure, I mean... hopefully, the problem is the only legal person I have seen discussing the computer glitches is sydney powell, rudy doesn't even bring it up.. I would feel a lot more confident if rudy mentioned it..