[–] 26325940? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Wisconsin is looking very good. Needs a little time statutorily. Will happen soon!

@Reince

@SeanDuffyWI

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1325891490636320768

[–] 26325962? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Pallets of Ballots!

[–] 26326218? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Wtf is “threshold identification”.? Two words that don’t seem to be able to occupy the same space

[–] 26326684? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Do the ballots reach the 'Threshold' of being legitimate? They are trying to identify the ballots that do meet the threshold and are legitimate.

[–] 26326738? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Identify which ballots arrived after the threshold (cutoff) time on Nov 3rd (?)


[B]allot + [B]allot capitalized is interesting ... B2 bomber? ... Bill Barr (or whatever)

[–] 26332919? ago 

Are the ballots signed. Is the vote cast by a living person, have they already cast their ballot, someone who resides in the district, is the paperwork complete, proper name ( big with women who change their name when married). In other word's,"legally eligible."

[–] 26326349? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Really, what does this mean? Why would POTUS tweet something that we can't understand?

[–] 26326668? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Probably because it's not for us? But after some time I'm sure some clever autist will find out interesting leads.

[–] 26327405? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Because now you can learn more.

[–] 26326372? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

From: doglegwarrior

what is threshold identification.. if he had said watermarks I might have had an overdose of hopium

[–] 26326564? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I don't want to overdose you further but adding to the conversation. That could be exactly what he's referring to. Lets say in the past 3-4 days they've been actively scanning ballots using laser tech or some industrial machine that is widespread and continuous enough that they've had the chance to go through millions of ballots to check for the watermark. If what we've been told about the fake ballots (with no watermarks) is true, then it's entirely possible that they've uncovered millions of fake ballots, all of which are in favor of Biden.

Open and shut case. If the watermark theory is true, and the NG or professionals are actively scanning them, then the perpetrators are well and truly fucked.

[–] 26326634? ago 

Who is "they"?

[–] 26326861? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Would the NG be allowed to do that already? Wouldn't it need a lawsuit first?

[–] 26326376? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

He is talking to the coup plotters. They have many ways to id these ballots. It means these fucks are busted.

[–] 26327086? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Why not just use Gab instead of Nitter? Gab mirrors DJT's Twitter feed.

https://gab.com/realdonaldtrump/posts/105182113224556508

[–] 26327297? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What am "threshold identification"?

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

[–] 26333603? ago 

There is one defining feature...all are for Biden.

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)