[–] 26291122? ago 

The military should be involved in poll watching and vote counting for all federal elections.

[–] 26291082? ago 

The thing is how do we have a cost effective method to prove and prevent these frauds to happen? Isn't this exactly what the government function is?

[–] 26291014? ago 

Well I guess that settles it then. Mail the math proof to SCOTUS and call it a day.

[–] 26290892? ago 

The problem is a lot of this math is oversimplified or misapplied.

For example, plenty of Trumps tallies dont match Benfords law either...its not a 100% fool proof diagnostic for fraud its just one of many possible signals.

[–] 26291202? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Agreed. I generally see digit analysis and other frequency evaluations used to identify an area of focus - not establish causation or blame.

[–] 26290678? ago 

Thats because these idiots practice common core math.

[–] 26290298? ago 

With all these mathematical anomalies flying around I sure hope I win the lottery today!

[–] 26292670? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We just need to collect evidence for a few more years, and then we'll be ready to start arresting traitors.

[–] 26292410? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The odds of having 100000 votes in a row for Biden in a string of only 5 million votes are so small that my scientific calculator can't do it. Assuming 50/50 for Biden overall, 100000 biden votes in a row happens once in 2^100000 groups of 100000 votes in a row. In MI there were roughly 5 million (~2^22) such groups, increasing those odds to one in 2^(100000-22). If powers of ten make more sense, that's one in 10^30000... that's a one and thirty thousand zeros. Ain't gonna happen. If you do the same math assuming only one percent of votes go to Trump, it doesn't change that much. 100000 for Biden in a row is still astronomically improbable.

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)