[–] Nigger_Loving_Jew ago 

Even if the voting software were open source how would you know that the binaries used in the machines was compiled form the same code?

[–] DC92T 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Being a machinist myself I completely understand your analogy. It should be open sourced, it should be tested and verified again and again. November 3rd decides which way our country goes and should be treated as important as it is...

[–] slwsnowman40 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I write shitty PowerShell scripts, but they work as intended first time every time once I work out the errors. There's no way these are glitches. The programs are working as designed - to favor the preferred government/Deep State outcome by a believable margin. The problem is, no one is believing their lying eyes.

[–] Hand_of_Node ago 

Believing or not is irrelevant. Do we see any indication at all that the owners of our country are going to change the system to be more in our favor?

[–] whatisbestinlife 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

this proves that house republicans are useless. it would appear that the only way you get good machines is to burn down the old machines and continue until good ones show up.

[–] ketoll 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I thought the Diebold machines were gone now? Are they still using those at some locations?

Remember when the DNC had their primaries and the machines fucked up the results? Why are people still this fucking stupid to vote on a computer?

[–] yukon456 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

the fact it's not open-source is all the proof i need to know its malicious. common sense

[–] Jammer78 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I am of the opinion that software should be used for speed of results and convenience ONLY. The official tally should always come from paper tabulations, added from mechanical counters. Copies of all papers made and storied locally. Then if the computer result doesn't equal the official result, you have a paper trail to find the error. This is simple addition not anything you need computers for.

I will never trust any software even it is "open source", because how can a poll-watching observer look at a computer and know what computer code is running on it? Ok so you bring up an interface that gives you the code -- what if that is a fake interface giving you the wrong info? What if there is a chip soldered on the board that overrides the software?

So I respect your analysis but you are overthinking it way too much. Any computers touching voting results should be unofficial only.

[–] AntiMason 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Same here. It would be a piece of cake.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)