[–] slwsnowman40 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I write shitty PowerShell scripts, but they work as intended first time every time once I work out the errors. There's no way these are glitches. The programs are working as designed - to favor the preferred government/Deep State outcome by a believable margin. The problem is, no one is believing their lying eyes.
[–] Hand_of_Node ago
Believing or not is irrelevant. Do we see any indication at all that the owners of our country are going to change the system to be more in our favor?
[–] whatisbestinlife 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
this proves that house republicans are useless. it would appear that the only way you get good machines is to burn down the old machines and continue until good ones show up.
[–] Jammer78 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I am of the opinion that software should be used for speed of results and convenience ONLY. The official tally should always come from paper tabulations, added from mechanical counters. Copies of all papers made and storied locally. Then if the computer result doesn't equal the official result, you have a paper trail to find the error. This is simple addition not anything you need computers for.
I will never trust any software even it is "open source", because how can a poll-watching observer look at a computer and know what computer code is running on it? Ok so you bring up an interface that gives you the code -- what if that is a fake interface giving you the wrong info? What if there is a chip soldered on the board that overrides the software?
So I respect your analysis but you are overthinking it way too much. Any computers touching voting results should be unofficial only.
[–] Nigger_Loving_Jew ago
Even if the voting software were open source how would you know that the binaries used in the machines was compiled form the same code?