[–] ChickenDeath 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What is the biggest possible fuckup in coding that you could do to cause damage? Just curious cause I onced fucked up loading something on the cnc and it almost used the wrong tool for a function or something I dont remember but I got in shit.
[–] screamingrubberband [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I will have to get back with you on that... There are so many examples! I usually will have more safety checks in a program than actual moves, but only because I've seen (and done) some pretty impressive screwups. Everything from a supervisor completely doused in high-pressure cutting oil from a gun drill (I still laugh my ass off whenever I remember that one!) to massively wrecking a 108" dual-column VTL that had just been rebuilt and upgraded to a custom-installed Fanuc system.
[–] AngelofDeath 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
With voting machines, you're dealing with a network of computers that ultimately talk to an outside the loop of voting machines computer, which then displays totals. Many access points to alter things. The very scanner scanning the printed version can be manipulated.
THINK BIGGER. The system is designed to fail. Now, be aware, it may not be those for Biden doing this shit, but TRUMP to justify taking other steps like military intervention. Or it could simply be the cabal simply attempting to get the white man to react violently to then justify attacking the white man. I mean they deliberately stand by as the niggers burn cities down. They stand by as antifa Jews destroy statues. WAITING FOR THE WHITE MAN TO SHOOT ONE IS ALL THEY'RE AFTER, perhaps.
[–] Hand_of_Node ago
It's the system preferred by the cabal. Imagine any of our other systems working this poorly.
[–] screamingrubberband [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
With voting machines, you're dealing with a network of computers that ultimately talk to an outside the loop of voting machines computer, which then displays totals. Many access points to alter things. The very scanner scanning the printed version can be manipulated.
You are correct.
And that is a problem.
Networked
Why? Why does a machine that is counting things need to be networked to a different machine that is counting different things? The counts should be isolated from each other. That guy's vote went into that machine, my vote went into this machine. Why do the machines need to talk to each other?
that ultimately talk to an outside the loop of voting machines computer
Again, why? Why does the computer in the gymnasium/church/office building that counts things, need to talk to anything 'outside the loop?' It is demonstrably insecure regardless of the communication protocols used. Print the results, print a hash of the results database, deliver the machine and the printout to the BOE.
Many access points to alter things.
Why let them exist at all?
The very scanner scanning the printed version can be manipulated.
Then obviously that is a problem that should nullify that piece of equipment.
[–] AngelofDeath 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I still amazed at your 250 lines of code for CNC. I would love to see it. What language?
I'm old and haven't done any coding for decades, but used to do Assembly Level, Pascal, Fortran, Cobol, a little C and C+. Some of the coding I wrote was many thousands of lines.
[–] peacegnome 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You would be a big fan of Bev Harris; she's been at this for many years.
I think that we should popularize an open source project for voting and have it be able to be deployed by a normal IT staff from a county (or a contractor if they don't have staff). If a county or state would like to use it then it would be free, and if it was even slightly popular then we could fund audits.
Right now everything is proprietary and when we have glimpsed what is going on it is always bad.
Also, it is 2020, we could easily do paper ballots, in person, with id, with complete chain of custody; then scan these ballots and put the scans online (torrent per county or precinct, or just aws, it wouldn't cost much), then the data people of the world could process them and find problems. Right now we get these blips of data with nothing backing them like "biden gains 140000, trump gains nothing, no comments attached for this delta", and until there is a recount even the party reps can't see what happened. They are obviously hiding something, this is how someone cheating acts. And really it should be a zero trust process, treating vote counting as anything else is ignorant and irrational.
[–] Hand_of_Node ago
treating vote counting as anything else is ignorant and irrational.
I'm going to argue that this is incorrect on two counts. Firstly, we don't treat vote counting as anything else, which is the problem. Secondly, the implication that a cheat-friendly system is irrational is the opposite of reality. When the winners gain the ability to literally control the lives of the losers, and the larger number is the only criteria that matters, ensuring your sides ability to "think outside the box" (cheat) is very rational in a society composed of cultures and races at war.
You're correct about how to make the ballots more secure, and the count more accurate, but that is clearly not what the actual owners of the United States want.
A popular meme account on one of the chans said "It's all a show. You're watching a movie."
The cult followers interpreted it as intended, to only apply to a specific instance, but it was the literal truth about the operation of what we perceive as 'our society'. Few enjoy the idea of essentially being cattle on a feedlot, or even in a pasture with real grass, so the vast majority of us cattle focus instead on the minutiae of everyday life. How to make the distribution of hay more fair. Who gets milked first. Whether the electricity powering the milking machines comes from sustainable sources...
[–] dukey 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
I've written 10k+ software programs. Voting software must be some of the easiest software to write. The majority of the code would simply be the GUI. Easy to write, easy to test. If there are 'bugs' it's either the system has been compromised somehow, remote hack running on the machine altering the internal program state, or someone is manually fudging the output of the program, or the program itself has been written to flip votes.
[–] Ozfer 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago (edited ago)
All the source code for casinos needs to be given to regulatory agencies and approved individually. Every single game requires source code analysis and testing. So does every machine before being allowed on a Casino floor. When in a casino each software package on the machine can be verified using signatures and hashes.
Beyond this since voting is about transparency and public elections ALL source code should be open source and inspectable by anyone. We need to prevent foreign and local interference. They also need to rule voting is not proprietary. Everyone knows how to add votes correctly and there is no trade secret.
Also no casino machine runs Bill Gates/NSA windows OS.
I wouldn't be surprised if some casinos out there use fuckin' nuclear technology to keep their money safe from someone getting the "jackpot". Anyone working in anything betting related tends to make a lot of money at the cost of their brain cells from having to deal with so many people.
[–] It_was_the_juice 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What software are they using to justify lockdowns? All I can tell is they use some shitty data to justify a political decision.
They do run tests and checks etc One Example Here, it's a little old but still could be useful - PDF WARNING a brief read of this can reveal some of the things you may be asking.
[–] Germ22 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
you should post stuff about your work to v/machinists
[–] screamingrubberband [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Hmmm... did not know that existed!
[–] Germ22 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
we need more content. i have been lacking in posting stuff myself lately as well.