[–] Smokybubbles 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Why would the government want to be accountable to all the peon fucktard citizens? Guess how many hundreds of billions of dollars go into contractor black projects for strippers and caviar as they screw around doing nothing?

[–] ReverendDobbs 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Cant blockchain be used with a printed receipt and have an option to later log on to a website and plug the receipt code info in ....that way there can be two or three counting or tallying methods running in different areas with different platforms and technologies. It would be impossible to hack all that simultaneously. (Just an ignoramus spitballn ideas here)

[–] thirdsargon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think you realize that the incompetence is by design.

I once worked with a psychopath, and I spent months getting our international payments to happen smoothly so that the staff and vendors could be paid on time. Every time I started closing in on a solution to our payments problem, he would find some way to fuck it up, or make it impossible, or just not be available to sign something for a couple of month and then tell me why that particular solution wasn't acceptable.

It took me a long time to realize the problem was not supposed to be solved. In retrospect, it's hard to believe it took me so long to realize.

[–] getshanked 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It took me a long time to realize the problem was not supposed to be solved.

I knew a guy in the public housing department here in Australia. It’s an open secret that trying to fix problems will put a target on your back. I imagine it’s the case in most government departments. Thomas Sowell said the same thing about his time at the Department of Labor.

[–] AngelofDeath 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

With voting machines, you're dealing with a network of computers that ultimately talk to an outside the loop of voting machines computer, which then displays totals. Many access points to alter things. The very scanner scanning the printed version can be manipulated.

THINK BIGGER. The system is designed to fail. Now, be aware, it may not be those for Biden doing this shit, but TRUMP to justify taking other steps like military intervention. Or it could simply be the cabal simply attempting to get the white man to react violently to then justify attacking the white man. I mean they deliberately stand by as the niggers burn cities down. They stand by as antifa Jews destroy statues. WAITING FOR THE WHITE MAN TO SHOOT ONE IS ALL THEY'RE AFTER, perhaps.

[–] Hand_of_Node ago 

It's the system preferred by the cabal. Imagine any of our other systems working this poorly.

[–] screamingrubberband [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

With voting machines, you're dealing with a network of computers that ultimately talk to an outside the loop of voting machines computer, which then displays totals. Many access points to alter things. The very scanner scanning the printed version can be manipulated.

You are correct.

And that is a problem.

Networked

Why? Why does a machine that is counting things need to be networked to a different machine that is counting different things? The counts should be isolated from each other. That guy's vote went into that machine, my vote went into this machine. Why do the machines need to talk to each other?

that ultimately talk to an outside the loop of voting machines computer

Again, why? Why does the computer in the gymnasium/church/office building that counts things, need to talk to anything 'outside the loop?' It is demonstrably insecure regardless of the communication protocols used. Print the results, print a hash of the results database, deliver the machine and the printout to the BOE.

Many access points to alter things.

Why let them exist at all?

The very scanner scanning the printed version can be manipulated.

Then obviously that is a problem that should nullify that piece of equipment.

[–] AngelofDeath 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I still amazed at your 250 lines of code for CNC. I would love to see it. What language?

I'm old and haven't done any coding for decades, but used to do Assembly Level, Pascal, Fortran, Cobol, a little C and C+. Some of the coding I wrote was many thousands of lines.

[–] ArcturianDeathTrap3 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Registered Democrat in Philadelphia: "They will not allow us within 30 to 100 feet, to supervise the ballots being counted. This is a coup..." 2020-11-05

https://www.bitchute.com/video/T3y6e4ypYrjh/

https://filebin.net/dk0296wng3gd4c8e/T3y6e4ypYrjh.mp4

The dark smoke is there

[–] ChickenDeath 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What is the biggest possible fuckup in coding that you could do to cause damage? Just curious cause I onced fucked up loading something on the cnc and it almost used the wrong tool for a function or something I dont remember but I got in shit.

[–] screamingrubberband [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I will have to get back with you on that... There are so many examples! I usually will have more safety checks in a program than actual moves, but only because I've seen (and done) some pretty impressive screwups. Everything from a supervisor completely doused in high-pressure cutting oil from a gun drill (I still laugh my ass off whenever I remember that one!) to massively wrecking a 108" dual-column VTL that had just been rebuilt and upgraded to a custom-installed Fanuc system.

[–] LexOrandiLexCredendi 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yep. I come out of medical software dev, where if something is flawed in the code there is a good chance that someone will die.

Gaping holes in the code are definitely a result of intentional coding.

[–] ReverendDobbs 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

All burocrats should have to go through a test to make it into office. I recommend a bullet to the head. If they live they can have the position. So far the only legitimate politician is kathy giffords.

[–] Hand_of_Node ago 

Is retesting a thing?

[–] ReverendDobbs ago 

Every election cycle.

load more comments ▼ (38 remaining)