[–] ArielQflip 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
So.....
Last Presidential Election 2016 I went to my polling place. Showed my ID and Voter Registration card. Election worker flipped through a pre-printed spiral notebook that had registered names. My name was found and I signed it. I was immediately handed a ballot.
This Election I voted early, not Absentee. I was handed an Absentee Application and was told to fill out my name and address only. Then took this document to a window where I showed my ID and Registration card. It was checked on a computer and then I was told to wait for my ballot. A moment later another person came foward and handed me my ballot. I filled out the ballot and inserted it into the ballot scanner.
It plausible that my signature was collected into a crypto database and was compared to the absentee application that was scanned, and and then encoded my signature data to the ballot I filled out by the so-called qfs blockchain watermark.
I could not see what happened to the absentee application after I turned it in.
All of this is plausible.
However, it does not make sense that Trump knew as the leak from yesterday said neither knew. Also, if you look in this video, who has a land line anymore? Dr. P has a diplomatic line to the corrupters that have caused all this mess including Q. Jones, Schroyer, and Dr. P are all C_A limited hangouts, yet the leak info all the time.
Dr. P has also said that Trump will get a 3rd Term and either Ivanka or Kushner will run in 2028 like a new Camelot. smh.
Mnuchin, Pompeo, Kushner all need to go.
I smell shit covered roses right now.
The fact the ballots were watermarked is the Epitome of election interference, even though we all know it's happened over and over.
This is a precipitous act to lock us all down with more AI imho in the future, as they will use this as a talking point to back up more surveillance on the world, later.
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'm still trying to figure out how a digital watermark is trackable by GPS. That claim, IMO, taints the claim.
[–] Blacksmith21 ago
Traceable, not trackable. I've read that gamma radiation can be detected from afar, as in the case of Victor Litvenenko and his Po-210 poisoning, but I've not been able to find any reference to the tracking of his radiactive sweat/fingerprints since the original event.
[–] Depl0rablEllie ago
Thanks Sheepdoggie! I always read your posts. I agree that this was The Plan all along. I know there are skeptics but I always believed that Q team is/was 100%. I tried to explain the Plan to my boyfriend but he doesn't get it. You know the usual "but there haven't been any arrests". I just shake my head. Some people just don't understand the enormous planning that went into this and how would they if they didn't follow Q and do all the research. I knew covid was bs right from the get go but people just think I'm nuts. I see and understand things differently I guess. Nice to be on here with similar minded people who don't just believe the narratives they brainwash the masses with. God Bless You Sheepddoggie! WWG1WGA
This is the only viable way I see of catching the bastards red handed. But the secrecy involved to make sure the Dems did not know about it makes it very difficult to believe. The Dems are sneaky bastards and seem to have deep state types planted everywhere and that would make hiding anything from them very hard.
[–] grace8 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago (edited ago)
here's more info on ballots and watermark
Pieczenik seemed to be saying that they placed the tracking/code on the ballots just 48 hours ago. I guess, After election and before the 3-4 am delivery of the fake ballots. The code can communicate where a ballot is so if they are dumped they can locate.
Wow! this is why the National Guard were called up in 12 states. Remember Q post asking why is national guard called up in 12 states (paraphrase).
Hi @grace8, Thanks, I've seen the info on the watermarks, block chain and other encoding (such as done by approved printers). This is a great control if indeed a bad actor tries to introduce fraudulent ballots into the voting. Right now the DHS (CISA) says there is no evidence of this. Read it here: https://nypost.com/2020/11/03/dhs-secretary-chad-wolf-no-sign-of-foreign-interference-in-2020-election/
That's not to say it hasn't been discovered yet -- but the problem is getting access to ballots to even identify if this type of fraud has occurred. Right now we can't say either way.
It's more likely that the majority of the fraud will be from manipulated ballots. In is much more difficult to detect and prove. So, if some intermediary intercepted ballots and manually changed the votes, how would you know? It would need to be obvious. And you need an audit trail. If votes were destroyed, how do you prove they were ever sent? If you find a bunch of votes received from dead voters, how do you prove they voted for Biden and not Trump? If someone saved a bunch of ballots, filled them in and introduced them late into the process, how do you prove it? Right now the priority is to get access to these states' election results and preserve any evidence that can be found.
The NY post link is from 11/3. That makes it info before/during time when Steve claims the watermark was secretly placed on legal ballots. So no CISA would not announce/admit it at that time and ruin the sting.
Can’t get access: I did see yesterday a report that 14 million ballots had been checked and that 48% of ballots checked in 2 of the contested states did not have the watermark. I think it should be in 8kun notables. As far as how do u tell if ballots have been dumped, Steve claims the isotopes tell them where a ballot is.
As far as if someone saved a bunch of ballots and filled in: they would not have the watermark if they were received after watermark was put on legal ballots received before deadline.
As far as ballot manipulation: if a ballot is scanned at the voting place scanners create a ballot image. Voters have a right to see their ballot image. If votes are flipped by programming in scanner comparing the ballot image count to the scanner count would show a discrepancy. Recently, in MA ballot images were destroyed before they could be audited. Election board tried to claim they were not legal voting records. Court precedent says they are.
Also software/firmware on a scanner can be audited by creating 20 ballots for Trump, scanning them in and then checking the tabulation to see if it is correct. Or when an irregularity is found in the count, the election board can recount by hand and compare. This happened yesterday in Atrium county and the count was very different. Was that Utah?
Destroyed votes: if the ballot has the isotopes and it sends a signal where it is the destroyed ballot can be found. If it is microscopic, shredding would not destroy it. If they were taken somewhere to be dumped/burned those tracking would have seen they were removed from counting center and intervened.
If Steve can be trusted then a lot of fraud can be proved if they get access.
The vote manipulation is so obvious because Biden got too few legal votes to make it a close election. If that can force a hand recount, that requires a observer from both parties to be present and see the ballot up close. They have to agree what each ballot says before the vote is recorded. That is if they can be forced to allow GOP observers to verify each ballot then the count will show discrepancy.
[–] 2infinity 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Even if true, it still needs to be proven in court, possibly the Supreme Court. Until then, don't celebrate until results are known.