[–] Anarchy99 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

its not suppose to make sense.

[–] SearchVoatBot 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.

Posted automatically (#144113) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@Doglegwarrior: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)

[–] It_was_the_juice ago 

When are Reupublicans going to start holding back the tallies in rural counties and then "finding" more votes once they see the tallies for the states? The dems have been doing it for years and no one has gone to jail. It would be even easier in the hundreds of rural districts in these states because it would be difficult for dems to go and observe all of them.

[–] Doglegwarrior [S] ago 

That is a good point. I am not religious but when these people say good versus evil this reminds me of that being a real thing. The conservatives try to do the right thing the democommies are fucking strait up evil

[–] FreeSpeechForever ago 

It's so fucking obvious. If they counted them first then they'd have to stick to their guns and trump could have beaten them.

If they count them last they just keep "counting" until Biden has it.

[–] Sheetz ago  (edited ago)

If they want to wait x after Election Day, then hold the election x after the election day.

[–] 19841989 ago 

This is how you cheat.

[–] MarauderShields ago 

This is how you destabilize and demoralize.

[–] Nicoladepierola ago  (edited ago)

Because they have a general idea of the total number. If that number is smaller than what the losing candidate needs to win then counting them would be a waste of time.

[–] Rivets69 ago 

You don’t want to count the easily fraudulent mail Ins until you know how many ballots you still need to win! Enter the mail-Ins.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)