[–] 26221820? 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Voter ID is the only true way to stop 90% of voter fraud... Why else would the democrats oppose it?
90% of the democrat votes ARE fraudulent... Democrats would prolly never get elected again, except for holdout districts like Beverly Hills, and a couple burroughs in NY.
[–] 26223682? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Some source (that took me exactly 13 ms to pull up on a search engine for you lazy fooks out there) on the overvoting in obama districts.
You can do your own search and see there are MANY other examples of this...
http://www.countynewsonline.org/blogs/2012/nov/election-fraud-zero-votes.html
[–] 26222412? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You haven't figured it out yet have you ?
NOTHING gets changed until it affects the left. Nothing.
Conservatives want VOTER ID ? Start cheating. Huge.
Conservatives want illegals gone ? Hire them, not to work at your company, hire them to kill liberals.
Conservatives want lower taxes ? Take out your hunting knives and allow it to serve its purpose.
The GOP for decades has been the party of tattling children, to an adult whose coked out dead on the couch.
[–] 26221382? 0 points 33 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago
Since it would be impossible to know which votes were the fraudulent ones, I think the most reasonable course would be to totally invalidate that district's votes and require an in-person special vote complete with ID.
The very existence of 100%+ votes would confirm for the Supreme Court that voter fraud is happening and only voter ID can stop it. EVERYONE's right to vote is compromised by cheating votes.
[–] 26226498? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Unpopular opinion: voter ID is not a cure all. Yes it will stop some but not all voting fraud.
[–] 26223339? 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Sauce for the OP? You seem to have just accepted it
[–] 26221927? 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
But AMY has recused herself! LOL. Couldn't WAIT to start stabbing trump in the back.
[–] 26224359? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Wrong. Incorrect. Erroneous.
She has NOT recused herself from anything.
She can not participate in votes for cases she didn't hear.
[–] 26222240? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The motion to allow fast track hearing on a PA case was already on and J. Barrett didn't participate and make them start over on the consideration again to include her. No reason was given why she didn't participate. Since a motion for fast track wasn't approved, now we'll see what happens when that same appeal for that PA case goes up the regular slow way, and will J. Barrett recuse or not.