[–] 26220941? ago 

Where, when? This thread is useless without the sauce.

[–] 26221913? ago 

Agreed. What's the point in sharing this if we can't share it with others? Need the sauce

[–] 26222681? ago  (edited ago)

[–] 26220964? ago 

This is what democracy looks like!!!!

[–] 26220971? ago 

By

Any

Means

Necessary

Learn to play the game faggot!

[–] 26221028? ago 

It is very hard to determine what 100% voting is, but your point is totally valid.

People age into voting age between the 10 year census, and tons of people die, move in and out, and travel around constantly, get felonies so they lose the right to vote, etc.
The most accurate counts would be the voter registrations, but typically registration records are only updated to accept NEW voters, not to purge anyone.
This is why Judicial Watch has been pushing for states to purge the voter registrations - to make sure they are accurate and only let valid voters actually participate.
Typically there is an "expected" voter turnout - which is what would be considered "100%" by many poll watchers. In turbulent years, the voter turnout is expected to be higher than usual, but within some margin of error.
Presidential years get higher voter turnout than midterms.

All that said, if there is an unexpected jump beyond expectations in the number of ballots received, there is definitely cause to suspect voter fraud - but because of the loose structure of the voting in the current times, this is impossible to prove unless caught first hand.

Secondly, as your last sentence rightly proclaims - nobody gives a good fuck about it. Guess that is just the way (((voting))) has evolved.

[–] 26221631? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

How about requiring voter registrations to be renewed periodically like driver’s licenses?

[–] 26221675? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That should be the standard, but states are (((encouraged))) to not do that (cheating is the main goal).

Most states have "automatic" registration when getting a license - that is the easiest way to get voters added.

Purging voters is difficult, because DL times are usually more than 2 years, so it becomes impossible to keep up with a database that adds at a much longer period than the voting cycles.

The best voting is still the paper ballots and dipping a finger in indelible ink. The US thinks it is "better" than that. LOL

[–] 26221128? 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

If a district has like 103% turnout then all the votes from that district should be divided by 1.03. If the only way it could be over 100% is by fraud but you can't find exactly where the fraud is, then just lower the number of votes.

[–] 26221660? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That would hurt legitimate voters though.

Need to have a re-vote with ID.

[–] 26226684? ago 

So then the play is to cheat in republican areas to invalidate them.

[–] 26221158? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

lawless country brought to you by the communists, sign of the times

[–] 26221382? 0 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago 

Since it would be impossible to know which votes were the fraudulent ones, I think the most reasonable course would be to totally invalidate that district's votes and require an in-person special vote complete with ID.

The very existence of 100%+ votes would confirm for the Supreme Court that voter fraud is happening and only voter ID can stop it. EVERYONE's right to vote is compromised by cheating votes.

[–] 26221927? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

But AMY has recused herself! LOL. Couldn't WAIT to start stabbing trump in the back.

[–] 26222240? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The motion to allow fast track hearing on a PA case was already on and J. Barrett didn't participate and make them start over on the consideration again to include her. No reason was given why she didn't participate. Since a motion for fast track wasn't approved, now we'll see what happens when that same appeal for that PA case goes up the regular slow way, and will J. Barrett recuse or not.

[–] 26224359? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wrong. Incorrect. Erroneous.

She has NOT recused herself from anything.

She can not participate in votes for cases she didn't hear.

[–] 26223339? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Sauce for the OP? You seem to have just accepted it

[–] 26226498? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Unpopular opinion: voter ID is not a cure all. Yes it will stop some but not all voting fraud.

[–] 26221455? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Democrats: Every vote counts* including our deceased constituents.

*Except Trump mail in votes... we throw those in a landfill.

[–] 26223192? ago 

#FraudulentBallotsMatter

load more comments ▼ (13 remaining)