[–] 26221382? 0 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago 

Since it would be impossible to know which votes were the fraudulent ones, I think the most reasonable course would be to totally invalidate that district's votes and require an in-person special vote complete with ID.

The very existence of 100%+ votes would confirm for the Supreme Court that voter fraud is happening and only voter ID can stop it. EVERYONE's right to vote is compromised by cheating votes.

[–] 26221927? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

But AMY has recused herself! LOL. Couldn't WAIT to start stabbing trump in the back.

[–] 26222240? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The motion to allow fast track hearing on a PA case was already on and J. Barrett didn't participate and make them start over on the consideration again to include her. No reason was given why she didn't participate. Since a motion for fast track wasn't approved, now we'll see what happens when that same appeal for that PA case goes up the regular slow way, and will J. Barrett recuse or not.

[–] 26224359? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wrong. Incorrect. Erroneous.

She has NOT recused herself from anything.

She can not participate in votes for cases she didn't hear.

[–] 26223339? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Sauce for the OP? You seem to have just accepted it

[–] 26226498? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Unpopular opinion: voter ID is not a cure all. Yes it will stop some but not all voting fraud.

[–] 26221820? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Voter ID is the only true way to stop 90% of voter fraud... Why else would the democrats oppose it?

90% of the democrat votes ARE fraudulent... Democrats would prolly never get elected again, except for holdout districts like Beverly Hills, and a couple burroughs in NY.

[–] 26227315? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Indelible ink.

Dip index finger in the ink and it finally goes away a week later.

This fucks with early voting faggots, but goddammit how fucking long do we need to be fucking voting? Election DAY.

[–] 26221455? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Democrats: Every vote counts* including our deceased constituents.

*Except Trump mail in votes... we throw those in a landfill.

[–] 26223192? ago 

#FraudulentBallotsMatter

[–] 26221128? 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

If a district has like 103% turnout then all the votes from that district should be divided by 1.03. If the only way it could be over 100% is by fraud but you can't find exactly where the fraud is, then just lower the number of votes.

[–] 26221660? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That would hurt legitimate voters though.

Need to have a re-vote with ID.

[–] 26226684? ago 

So then the play is to cheat in republican areas to invalidate them.

[–] 26222738? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

during Obama campaign several states had over 100% of the vote for that piece of shit.

[–] 26223333? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Source?

[–] 26224103? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's in every fucking election... Practically all over your spaghetti.wtf

[–] 26225459? ago 

article was here but I can't find the source quickly as it isn't easily searched. what was the voat search site?

[–] 26223682? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Some source (that took me exactly 13 ms to pull up on a search engine for you lazy fooks out there) on the overvoting in obama districts.

You can do your own search and see there are MANY other examples of this...

http://www.countynewsonline.org/blogs/2012/nov/election-fraud-zero-votes.html

[–] 26243980? ago 

I say, if there is an overvote, all votes for that precinct should be thrown out. That way if someone sees someone cheating they will call them out and everyone can then participate in beating that cheater to death.

[–] 26221808? ago 

Well you said nothing incorrect, but don't confuse >100% voter registration with participation, because it's easy to. Over-registration could be a sign of corruption but is typically just laziness. Over-participation is a sign of a crime.

load more comments ▼ (13 remaining)