[–] folgeyharry 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The wikipedia talk page explains their reasoning. They only accept "Reliable Sources", which just happen to be all left-wing, such as CNN, MSNBC and even Vanity Fair. OTOH, Fox News, NY Post, or Washington Examiner, are all unreliable, so nothing they say is included. The left wing media all claim it's false, so, to them, therefore it is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Biden%E2%80%93Ukraine_conspiracy_theory#Discussion

[–] jxfaith 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Which is funny, because the NY Post broke the article that triggered this entire ckusterfuck.

[–] AlternateSelection 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The first false allegation conspiracy theory with solid actual evidence to back it up. Evidence you can see, read, hear, hold in your hand, solid real evidence that the left doesn't seem to be able to distinguish from fantasy world.

[–] Wingrider ago 

Of course, lying is what they do best.

[–] Nesano 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"Debunked"

BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

[–] antiracistMetal 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Just like pizzagate.

[–] SerialLarper 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Wikipedia was always a cognitive infiltration operation. The old DNS records went back to the the same parent company as for wikileaks.

[–] boekanier 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They are after the monopoly of 'knowledge', but it's more like false or inaccurate information, especially that which is deliberately intended to deceive.

[–] SerialLarper 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

A good example is William Connolley:

All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions. Acolytes whose writing conformed to Connolley’s global warming views, in contrast, were rewarded with Wikipedia’s blessings. In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/19/wikibullies-at-work-the-national-post-exposes-broad-trust-issues-over-wikipedia-climate-information/

[–] Gustomaximus ago 

If false I would expect both Hunter and his niece to be dropping law suits or at least threatening them.

I dont understand why that would not be happening ASAP.

[–] thebearfromstartrack 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The ends DOES NOT justify the means. Wikipedia has to LIVE without credibility now. just SOLD it.

load more comments ▼ (13 remaining)