[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] TheFuglyAmerican [S] ago 

Good point.

[–] TXWYNMTX 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

What was the surprise? We’ve known all this?

[–] TheFuglyAmerican [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yea, we've known but your average housewife or numskull 20 something didn't. Now there is evidence on laptops and cell phones with first hand witnesses willing to testify into the Biden family's corruption. This is huge!!!

The only way this goes away without prosecutions is if the Dems steal the election through voter fraud.

[–] mickeymantle ago 

For the Normies

[–] Jellybumps ago 

The surprise should even surprise us.

But how is that even possible. Considering all that we know.

And nothing has surprised us yet.

And it's still October.

[–] ssgrader ago  (edited ago)

it isn't over yet.. many booms today....

Fugly spot on .. and great post...

[–] Bir_Yaqub ago 

The trouble with October surprises is that they raise the question, why did the FBI and the DOJ sit on this evidence? Somebody was obstructing justice or at least derelict in their duty. If the information benefits the President, suspicion falls on him as well.

[–] TheFuglyAmerican [S] ago  (edited ago)

I disagree. Rudy J , as the personal attorney of the President, has been investigating this matter for years constantly informing the public on as many news shows that would have him. As well as informing the FBI and other intelligence agencies for two years.

If the FBI or DOJ have dragged their heels I believe it is because they are uncertain of the outcome of this election and if Biden were to win then the FBI and DOJ would also hold Biden like a puppet on strings because they could annihilate him if he did not do as he is told.

Trump will not have true hold of those agencies unless he wins on Nov. 3rd. And even then it would be an uphill battle.

[–] Intlrnt2 ago  (edited ago)

You appear to be as confused about the ‘October Surprise’ concept as you are about Kyle Rittenhouse.

Remember how you portrayed Kyle?

” Kyle Rittenhouse was a misguided young man, though breaking multiple laws such as a minor possessing a firearm, carrying an illegally possessed weapon across state lines and so on, with good intentions but unrealistic expectations, Kyle decided to play vigilante - super hero in the hood of Kenosha to protect his backyard from being burned and looted. . . what I saw on those videos, a young punk kid playing super hero with a 2000 dollar riffle”

Lie after lie after lie. And these months later, long after your disparaging remarks have been proven as completely incorrect mischaracterizations, you still leave them posted, represented as accurate here.

Seems you have some housekeeping to tend to before starting another slide.

[–] TheFuglyAmerican [S] ago  (edited ago)

I wrote that before becoming aware that he got the gun from a friend in Wisconsin, I admit I was way off base on that one. My comments were made based on the Illinois charges I had heard on the radio that day, which later were dropped. But still a 17 year old walking around with a semi-automatic riffle during a riot is a bad idea. And now he is facing potentially years of prison time in the Wisconsin DOC from the murder charges, even though it was clearly self defense.

[–] Intlrnt2 ago 

Do the housekeeping.

Edit the lies and disgraceful mischaracterizations out of that hit piece.

Then maybe you will be deserving of our attention.