[–] 26051009? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Lol, love the reverse psychology there..

[–] 26051548? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Brilliant. Nice use of links as well. And as a anon said in here already "26050414? 29 points (+29|-0) 1.6 hours ago

Now that's how you infiltrate and red pill! Well done."

[–] 26050519? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Lmaooooo

[–] 26050506? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Kek

[–] 26051270? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I certainly didn't expect that when I clicked on the link. Well done!

[–] 26050560? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

That's the way you do it.

[–] 26050636? 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Been following this Twatter for a week or so... Great stuff!

[–] 26056699? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

A spoof account I am guessing?

[–] 26057831? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Definitely parody... look into the Tweets. Spells everything out the way it really is, but always puts a cringe liberal “spin” on it to explain away. Brilliant.

[–] 26051175? 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

That's priceless.

I love it when someone leaves you guessing as to their intent.

Invokes actual thought.

[–] 26055217? ago 

Haha if you really felt that way you're not that bright. It's not as clever as you think it is.

[–] 26056103? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Try not to act so pompous. For many others it is.

[–] 26054300? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah, I commented on twatter the other day that I want Biden to win so he could roll back the tax cuts like he said. Also, so what if the bottom 10% benefitted the most, it's not really that much and won't help them anyway.

[–] 26054924? ago 

Kudos

[–] 26055251? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Bottom 10% benefitted the most? Are you intentionally dense? Tax return data for 2018 is out and the results are what was expected,

https://www.policygenius.com/taxes/who-benefited-most-from-the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act/

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)